Landmark Conference websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 9 Landmark Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Landmark Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 87

Average overall score of 8 fully scanned Landmark Conference member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

8 of 9

Landmark conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Landmark Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Landmark Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Landmark Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Landmark Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 894
90 to 1003

Landmark Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Landmark Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Landmark ConferenceA (90 to 100): 38% (3 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 63% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Landmark Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Landmark Conference38% (3)63% (5)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Landmark Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 8 fully scanned Landmark Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility92All education: 91
  2. Botability94All education: 89
  3. Security84All education: 85
  4. Usability72All education: 68
  5. Readability75All education: 56
  • Landmark Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Landmark Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorLandmark Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9291
Botability9489
Security8485
Usability7268
Readability7556

Top 3 Landmark Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Landmark Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Lycoming College

A 97 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Landmark Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Goucher College

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in Landmark Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Wilkes University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Landmark Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Landmark Conference members by overall score

Landmark Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 lycoming.edu
Lycoming College U.S. rank 4
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 goucher.edu
Goucher College U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
2 wilkes.edu
Wilkes University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 catholic.edu
The Catholic University of America U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
4 scranton.edu
University of Scranton U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
5 drew.edu
Drew University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
5 moravian.edu
Moravian University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
6 etown.edu
Elizabethtown College U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
susqu.edu
Susquehanna University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo