Landmark Conference websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 9 Landmark Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing Landmark Conference member sites. All education sites

Members of the Landmark Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 72

Average usability score of 8 fully scanned Landmark Conference member sites

10th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

8 of 9

Landmark conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Landmark Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Landmark Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • Landmark Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 593
60 to 691
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1001

Landmark Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Landmark Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Landmark Conference
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Landmark Conference13% (1)38% (3)50% (4)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Landmark Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Landmark Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Lycoming College

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Landmark Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Goucher College

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#3 in Landmark Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Wilkes University

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Landmark Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Landmark Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt88%
  2. Open Graph description63%
  3. Open Graph image63%
  4. Open Graph site name63%
  5. Open Graph type50%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt88%7
Open Graph description63%5
Open Graph image63%5
Open Graph site name63%5
Open Graph type50%4

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.

Every education site with one problem

Landmark Conference members by usability score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 lycoming.edu
Lycoming College U.S. rank 2 		15 of 16 checks pass A
2 goucher.edu
Goucher College U.S. rank 4 		14 of 16 checks pass B
3 wilkes.edu
Wilkes University U.S. rank 9 		13 of 16 checks pass B
4 scranton.edu
University of Scranton U.S. rank 13 		12 of 16 checks pass C
5 drew.edu
Drew University U.S. rank 17 		11 of 16 checks pass D
6 etown.edu
Elizabethtown College U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F
6 moravian.edu
Moravian University U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F
6 catholic.edu
The Catholic University of America U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F
susqu.edu
Susquehanna University 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo