American Rivers Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 8 American Rivers Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the American Rivers Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 76

Average usability score of 8 fully scanned American Rivers Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

8 of 8

American rivers conference member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How American Rivers Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned American Rivers Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • American Rivers Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How American Rivers Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 491
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 791
80 to 891
90 to 1003

American Rivers Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. American Rivers Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. American Rivers ConferenceA (90 to 100): 38% (3 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (2 sites)D to F (below 70): 38% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
American Rivers Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
American Rivers Conference38% (3)25% (2)38% (3)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 American Rivers Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in American Rivers Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Central College

A 100 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in American Rivers Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Buena Vista University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability D
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in American Rivers Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Loras College

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among American Rivers Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned American Rivers Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt63% (5 of 8 sites)
  2. Page description38% (3 of 8 sites)
  3. Time to First Byte (TTFB)38% (3 of 8 sites)
  4. Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)38% (3 of 8 sites)
  5. Open Graph image38% (3 of 8 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among American Rivers Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt63%5
Page description38%3
Time to First Byte (TTFB)38%3
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)38%3
Open Graph image38%3

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Page description. The page has a meta description that summarizes its content for search results. Search results do not show what your page does.
  • Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.
  • Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). Page content stays in place as the page loads. Users click wrong buttons by mistake.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.

Every education site with one problem

American Rivers Conference members by usability score

American Rivers Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 central.edu
Central College U.S. rank 1
16 of 16 checks pass A
2 bvu.edu
Buena Vista University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 loras.edu
Loras College U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
3 coe.edu
Coe College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
4 simpson.edu
Simpson College U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
5 wartburg.edu
Wartburg College U.S. rank 20
10 of 16 checks pass D
6 dbq.edu
University of Dubuque U.S. rank 21
9 of 15 checks pass D
7 nebrwesleyan.edu
Nebraska Wesleyan University U.S. rank 27
7 of 16 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo