American Rivers Conference: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 8 American Rivers Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing American Rivers Conference member sites. All education sites

Members of the American Rivers Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 87

Average botability score of 8 fully scanned American Rivers Conference member sites

11th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

8 of 8

American rivers conference member sites fully scanned

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How American Rivers Conference botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned American Rivers Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • American Rivers Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1006

American Rivers Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. American Rivers Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. American Rivers Conference
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
American Rivers Conference75% (6)0% (0)25% (2)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 American Rivers Conference member sites by botability score

#1 in American Rivers Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Central College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in American Rivers Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Loras College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in American Rivers Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Coe College

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among American Rivers Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned American Rivers Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Link text63%
  2. Sitemap status25%
  3. Sitemap XML25%
  4. Sitemap in robots.txt13%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
Link text63%5
Sitemap status25%2
Sitemap XML25%2
Sitemap in robots.txt13%1

What each check means

  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.

Every education site with one problem

American Rivers Conference members by botability score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 central.edu
Central College U.S. rank 1 		11 of 11 checks pass A
1 loras.edu
Loras College U.S. rank 1 		11 of 11 checks pass A
2 coe.edu
Coe College U.S. rank 2 		10 of 11 checks pass A
2 nebrwesleyan.edu
Nebraska Wesleyan University U.S. rank 2 		10 of 11 checks pass A
2 simpson.edu
Simpson College U.S. rank 2 		10 of 11 checks pass A
2 wartburg.edu
Wartburg College U.S. rank 2 		10 of 11 checks pass A
3 bvu.edu
Buena Vista University U.S. rank 14 		6 of 9 checks pass D
3 dbq.edu
University of Dubuque U.S. rank 14 		6 of 9 checks pass D

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo