Showing American Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the American Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
D 65
Average usability score of 13 fully scanned American Conference member sites
17th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
13 of 13
American conference member sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How American Conference usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 13 fully scanned American Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 13 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- American Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 2 |
| 50 to 59 | 2 |
| 60 to 69 | 4 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 4 |
| 90 to 100 | 0 |
American Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. American Conference: 13 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Conference | 0% (0) | 38% (5) | 62% (8) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 American Conference member sites by usability score
#1 in American Conference · U.S. education rank 4
Rice University
B 87 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
#2 in American Conference · U.S. education rank 9
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
B 81 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
#2 in American Conference · U.S. education rank 9
University of Tulsa
B 81 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability F
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
American Conference members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
rice.edu
Rice University U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
charlotte.edu
University of North Carolina at Charlotte U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
utulsa.edu
University of Tulsa U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
fau.edu
Florida Atlantic University U.S. rank 10 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
ecu.edu
East Carolina University U.S. rank 14 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio U.S. rank 17 |
11 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 5 |
tulane.edu
Tulane University of Louisiana U.S. rank 17 |
11 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 6 |
unt.edu
University of North Texas U.S. rank 18 |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 7 |
temple.edu
Temple University U.S. rank 21 |
9 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 8 |
uab.edu
University of Alabama at Birmingham U.S. rank 25 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
memphis.edu
University of Memphis U.S. rank 25 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 9 |
usf.edu
University of South Florida U.S. rank 29 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 9 |
wichita.edu
Wichita State University U.S. rank 29 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.