American Conference websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 13 American Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 13
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the American Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 65

Average usability score of 13 fully scanned American Conference member sites

17th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

13 of 13

American conference member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How American Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 13 fully scanned American Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 13 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • American Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How American Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 492
50 to 592
60 to 694
70 to 791
80 to 894
90 to 1000

American Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. American Conference: 13 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. American ConferenceB to C (70 to 89): 38% (5 sites)D to F (below 70): 62% (8 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
American Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
American Conference0% (0)38% (5)62% (8)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 American Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in American Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Rice University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in American Conference · U.S. education rank 9

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in American Conference · U.S. education rank 9

University of Tulsa

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among American Conference member sites

Share of the 13 fully scanned American Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt100% (13 of 13 sites)
  2. First Contentful Paint (FCP)54% (7 of 13 sites)
  3. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)54% (7 of 13 sites)
  4. Open Graph description54% (7 of 13 sites)
  5. Open Graph image54% (7 of 13 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among American Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt100%13
First Contentful Paint (FCP)54%7
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)54%7
Open Graph description54%7
Open Graph image54%7

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.

Every education site with one problem

American Conference members by usability score

American Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 rice.edu
Rice University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 charlotte.edu
University of North Carolina at Charlotte U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
2 utulsa.edu
University of Tulsa U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 fau.edu
Florida Atlantic University U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
4 ecu.edu
East Carolina University U.S. rank 14
11 of 15 checks pass C
5 utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
5 tulane.edu
Tulane University of Louisiana U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
6 unt.edu
University of North Texas U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
7 temple.edu
Temple University U.S. rank 21
9 of 15 checks pass D
8 uab.edu
University of Alabama at Birmingham U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
8 memphis.edu
University of Memphis U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
9 usf.edu
University of South Florida U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
9 wichita.edu
Wichita State University U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo