American Conference websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 13 American Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 13
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the American Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 86

Average overall score of 13 fully scanned American Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

13 of 13

American conference member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How American Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 13 fully scanned American Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 13 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • American Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How American Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 793
80 to 895
90 to 1005

American Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. American Conference: 13 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. American ConferenceA (90 to 100): 38% (5 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 62% (8 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
American Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
American Conference38% (5)62% (8)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

American Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 13 fully scanned American Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility95All education: 91
  2. Botability88All education: 89
  3. Security87All education: 85
  4. Usability65All education: 68
  5. Readability62All education: 56
  • American Conference
  • All education
View the data table
American Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorAmerican Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9591
Botability8889
Security8785
Usability6568
Readability6256

Top 3 American Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in American Conference · U.S. education rank 7

East Carolina University

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#2 in American Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Rice University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in American Conference · U.S. education rank 9

University of Tulsa

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check American Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

American Conference members by overall score

American Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 ecu.edu
East Carolina University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
2 rice.edu
Rice University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 utulsa.edu
University of Tulsa U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
4 fau.edu
Florida Atlantic University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 charlotte.edu
University of North Carolina at Charlotte U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
5 unt.edu
University of North Texas U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
6 temple.edu
Temple University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
7 tulane.edu
Tulane University of Louisiana U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
8 memphis.edu
University of Memphis U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
9 utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
10 usf.edu
University of South Florida U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
11 wichita.edu
Wichita State University U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
12 uab.edu
University of Alabama at Birmingham U.S. rank 29
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo