Showing Connecticut county sites. All U.S. county sites
D 63
Average usability score of 8 fully scanned Connecticut county sites
3rd
of 49 states, ranked by average usability score
8 of 8
Sites fully scanned
F 48
U.S. county average usability score, 2467 fully scanned sites
Connecticut's state site, portal.ct.gov, ranks 6th of 51 state sites with an A. State rankings.
How Connecticut county usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Connecticut county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Connecticut average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 1 |
| 30 to 39 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 1 |
| 70 to 79 | 2 |
| 80 to 89 | 3 |
| 90 to 100 | 0 |
Connecticut counties by usability grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- No site on our list
8 of the 8 sites on our list could not be matched to a county boundary and appear only in the table.
Connecticut counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Connecticut: 8 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | 0% (0) | 63% (5) | 38% (3) |
| All U.S. counties | 2% (39) | 16% (403) | 82% (2,025) |
Top 3 Connecticut county sites by usability score
#1 in Connecticut · U.S. rank 7
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT
B 80 usability
- Accessibility C
- Botability C
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
#1 in Connecticut · U.S. rank 7
Northwest Hills Planning Region, CT
B 80 usability
- Accessibility B
- Botability B
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
#1 in Connecticut · U.S. rank 7
Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT
B 80 usability
- Accessibility B
- Botability B
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- Page description. The page has a meta description that summarizes its content for search results. Search results do not show what your page does.
All Connecticut county sites by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
nvcogct.gov
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT U.S. rank 7 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 1 |
nhcogct.gov
Northwest Hills Planning Region, CT U.S. rank 7 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 1 |
secogct.gov
Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT U.S. rank 7 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
metrocogct.gov
Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT U.S. rank 10 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 2 |
rivercog.org
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT U.S. rank 10 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
neccog.org
Northeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT U.S. rank 15 |
10 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 4 |
crcogct.gov
Capitol Planning Region, CT U.S. rank 28 |
5 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
westcog.org
Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT U.S. rank 30 |
4 of 15 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Connecticut. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 10/28/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.