Texas college websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 92 public and 59 private college and university websites in Texas, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 151
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Public colleges and universities in Texas are ranked and averaged together; private nonprofit institutions are listed below with their own average.

B 85

Average overall score of 86 fully scanned Texas public college sites

5th

of 48 states and territories, ranked by average overall score

86 of 92

Texas public college sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 6, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Texas overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 86 fully scanned Texas public college sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 86 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Texas average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Texas overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 7914
80 to 8949
90 to 10021

Texas by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Texas: 86 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. TexasA (90 to 100): 24% (21 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (63 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (2 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Texas by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Texas24% (21)73% (63)2% (2)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Texas average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 86 fully scanned Texas public college sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility93All education: 91
  2. Botability88All education: 89
  3. Security85All education: 85
  4. Usability66All education: 68
  5. Readability67All education: 56
  • Texas
  • All education
View the data table
Texas average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorTexas averageAll education average
Accessibility9391
Botability8889
Security8585
Usability6668
Readability6756

Top 3 Texas public college sites by overall score

#1 in Texas · U.S. education rank 6

College of the Mainland

A 95 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Texas · U.S. education rank 6

North Central Texas College

A 95 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Texas · U.S. education rank 6

San Jacinto Community College

A 95 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Texas public college sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Texas public 4-year institutions by overall score

62 sites, 57 fully scanned, average overall score 85 (B). Part of the headline average.

Texas public 4-year institutions ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 com.edu
College of the Mainland U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
1 sanjac.edu
San Jacinto Community College U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
1 tamus.edu
Texas A & M University-System Office U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 angelo.edu
Angelo State University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 hccs.edu
Houston Community College U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 grayson.edu
Grayson College U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
3 msutexas.edu
Midwestern State University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
3 tsu.edu
Texas Southern University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 wtamu.edu
West Texas A & M University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 utdallas.edu
The University of Texas at Dallas U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 utsystem.edu
The University of Texas System Office U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
4 uh.edu
University of Houston U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
5 dallascollege.edu
U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
5 gc.edu
Galveston College U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
5 southtexascollege.edu
South Texas College U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
5 tamucc.edu
Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
5 tamu.edu
Texas A&M University-College Station U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
5 wc.edu
Weatherford College U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
6 lamar.edu
Lamar University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
6 utmb.edu
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
6 unt.edu
University of North Texas U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
7 alamo.edu
U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
7 alvincollege.edu
Alvin Community College U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
7 tarleton.edu
Tarleton State University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
7 tamuct.edu
Texas A&M University-Central Texas U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
7 tamuk.edu
Texas A&M University-Kingsville U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
7 uta.edu
The University of Texas at Arlington U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
7 utrgv.edu
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
7 uhd.edu
University of Houston-Downtown U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
7 utsouthwestern.edu
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
8 collin.edu
Collin County Community College District U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
9 austincc.edu
Austin Community College District U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
9 sulross.edu
Sul Ross State University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
9 txst.edu
Texas State University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
9 tvcc.edu
Trinity Valley Community College U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
10 utep.edu
The University of Texas at El Paso U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
10 uth.edu
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
11 tamut.edu
Texas A&M University-Texarkana U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
12 shsu.edu
Sam Houston State University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
12 twu.edu
Texas Woman's University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
12 utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
12 utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
13 midland.edu
Midland College U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 sfasu.edu
Stephen F Austin State University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 tamusa.edu
Texas A&M University-San Antonio U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 uttyler.edu
The University of Texas at Tyler U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
13 uthscsa.edu
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
14 ttuhsc.edu
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
14 uhcl.edu
University of Houston-Clear Lake U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
14 untdallas.edu
University of North Texas at Dallas U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
15 delmar.edu
Del Mar College U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
15 lonestar.edu
Lone Star College System U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
15 utpb.edu
The University of Texas Permian Basin U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
16 tamiu.edu
Texas A & M International University U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
17 texastech.edu
Texas Tech University System Administration U.S. rank 29
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
18 ttu.edu
Texas Tech University U.S. rank 32
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
D
19 navarrocollege.edu
Navarro College U.S. rank 36
  • Accessibility grade D
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
D
laredo.edu
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 404 -
brazosport.edu
Brazosport College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -
odessa.edu
Odessa College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
pvamu.edu
Prairie View A & M University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 -
tjc.edu
Tyler Junior College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

Texas public 2-year institutions by overall score

30 sites, 29 fully scanned, average overall score 85 (B). Part of the headline average.

Texas public 2-year institutions ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 nctc.edu
North Central Texas College U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 tccd.edu
Tarrant County College District U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 tstc.edu
Texas State Technical College U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
3 ntcc.edu
Northeast Texas Community College U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 lsco.edu
Lamar State College-Orange U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 texarkanacollege.edu
Texarkana College U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 epcc.edu
El Paso Community College U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade -
A
5 mclennan.edu
McLennan Community College U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
6 cisco.edu
Cisco College U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
A
7 fpctx.edu
Frank Phillips College U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
7 kilgore.edu
Kilgore College U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
B
8 angelina.edu
Angelina College U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
8 rangercollege.edu
Ranger College U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
9 howardcollege.edu
Howard College U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
9 tsc.edu
Texas Southmost College U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
10 lamarpa.edu
Lamar State College-Port Arthur U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
10 parisjc.edu
Paris Junior College U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
11 panola.edu
Panola College U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
11 vernoncollege.edu
Vernon College U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
12 wtc.edu
Western Texas College U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade -
B
12 wcjc.edu
Wharton County Junior College U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 blinn.edu
Blinn College District U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 lee.edu
Lee College U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
14 hillcollege.edu
Hill College U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
15 coastalbend.edu
Coastal Bend College U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
16 ctcd.edu
Central Texas College U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
17 southplainscollege.edu
South Plains College U.S. rank 27
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
18 lit.edu
Lamar Institute of Technology U.S. rank 30
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
19 victoriacollege.edu
Victoria College U.S. rank 31
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
clarendoncollege.edu
Clarendon College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -

Texas private nonprofit institutions by overall score

59 sites, 55 fully scanned, average overall score 85 (B). Ranked among themselves. Not part of the public average above.

Texas private nonprofit institutions ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 bcm.edu
Baylor College of Medicine U.S. rank 4
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
1 tcu.edu
Texas Christian University U.S. rank 4
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 nelson.edu
Nelson University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
2 paulquinn.edu
Paul Quinn College U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
3 brite.edu
Brite Divinity School U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
3 rice.edu
Rice University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 stcl.edu
South Texas College of Law Houston U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
A
4 acu.edu
Abilene Christian University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 abu.edu
Arlington Baptist University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
5 hsutx.edu
Hardin-Simmons University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
5 lcu.edu
Lubbock Christian University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 stedwards.edu
Saint Edward's University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
5 smu.edu
Southern Methodist University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
6 wileyc.edu
Wiley University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
7 amberton.edu
Amberton University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
7 messengercollege.edu
Messenger College U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
7 ost.edu
Oblate School of Theology U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
7 swbts.edu
The Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
8 cbshouston.edu
College of Biblical Studies-Houston U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
8 parker.edu
Parker University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
9 baylor.edu
Baylor University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
9 cmctx.edu
Christ Mission College U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
9 dbu.edu
Dallas Baptist University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
9 swau.edu
Southwestern Adventist University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
9 tlu.edu
Texas Lutheran University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
9 tku.edu
The King's University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
9 stthom.edu
University of St Thomas U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
9 uiw.edu
University of the Incarnate Word U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
10 bmats.edu
Baptist Missionary Association Theological Seminary U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
10 txchiro.edu
Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
11 dallasinstitute.edu
Dallas Institute of Funeral Service U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
11 na.edu
North American University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
11 schreiner.edu
Schreiner University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
11 southwestern.edu
Southwestern University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
11 stmarytx.edu
St. Mary's University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
12 concordia.edu
Concordia University Texas U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
12 gsot.edu
Grace School of Theology U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
12 udallas.edu
University of Dallas U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
13 ssw.edu
Episcopal Theological Seminary of the Southwest U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
14 austincollege.edu
Austin College U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
14 austinseminary.edu
Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
14 hputx.edu
Howard Payne University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
14 htu.edu
Huston-Tillotson University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
15 dts.edu
Dallas Theological Seminary U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
15 jarvis.edu
Jarvis Christian University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
15 mcm.edu
McMurry University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
16 criswell.edu
Criswell College U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade D
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
C
16 dallas.edu
Dallas Christian College U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
16 jacksonvillecollege.edu
Jacksonville College-Main Campus U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
16 letu.edu
LeTourneau University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
17 swcc.edu
Southwestern Christian College U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
18 ollusa.edu
Our Lady of the Lake University U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
19 bgu.edu
Bakke Graduate University U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
20 wbu.edu
Wayland Baptist University U.S. rank 29
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 texascollege.edu
Texas College U.S. rank 38
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
D
bua.edu
Baptist University of the Americas
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
etbu.edu
East Texas Baptist University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
hc.edu
Houston Christian University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
txwes.edu
Texas Wesleyan University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 6 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo