Research university websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 274 research university websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 274
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Every R1 and R2 university on our list, the Carnegie 2021 doctoral universities with high or very high research activity.

B 86

Average overall score of 248 fully scanned research university sites

2nd

of 9 lists, ranked by average overall score

248 of 274

Research university sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 26, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Research universities overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 248 fully scanned research university sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 248 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Research universities average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Research universities overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 693
70 to 7932
80 to 89144
90 to 10069

Research universities by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Research universities: 248 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Research universitiesA (90 to 100): 28% (69 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 71% (176 sites)D to F (below 70): 1% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Research universities by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Research universities28% (69)71% (176)1% (3)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Research universities average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 248 fully scanned research university sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility94All education: 91
  2. Botability88All education: 89
  3. Security86All education: 85
  4. Usability68All education: 68
  5. Readability54All education: 56
  • Research universities
  • All education
View the data table
Research universities average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorResearch universities averageAll education average
Accessibility9491
Botability8889
Security8685
Usability6868
Readability5456

Top 3 research university sites by overall score

#1 in Research universities · U.S. education rank 2

University of Kansas

A 99 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Research universities · U.S. education rank 4

Stanford University

A 97 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Research universities · U.S. education rank 4

Texas Christian University

A 97 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check research university sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Research universities by overall score

Research universities ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 ku.edu
University of Kansas U.S. rank 2
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 stanford.edu
Stanford University U.S. rank 4
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
2 tcu.edu
Texas Christian University U.S. rank 4
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 umbc.edu
University of Maryland-Baltimore County U.S. rank 4
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
3 lmu.edu
Loyola Marymount University U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 mercer.edu
Mercer University U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
3 purdue.edu
Purdue University-Main Campus U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
3 illinois.edu
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
3 umb.edu
University of Massachusetts-Boston U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 nd.edu
University of Notre Dame U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
4 binghamton.edu
Binghamton University U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
4 marshall.edu
Marshall University U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 wayne.edu
Wayne State University U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
5 clarku.edu
Clark University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
5 ecu.edu
East Carolina University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
5 indianapolis.iu.edu
Indiana University-Indianapolis U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 luc.edu
Loyola University Chicago U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
5 miamioh.edu
Miami University-Oxford U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
5 northeastern.edu
Northeastern University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 utk.edu
The University of Tennessee-Knoxville U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 uconn.edu
University of Connecticut U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
5 uiowa.edu
University of Iowa U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 twin-cities.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
5 umkc.edu
University of Missouri-Kansas City U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 une.edu
University of New England U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
5 usc.edu
University of Southern California U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
5 wfu.edu
Wake Forest University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
6 clemson.edu
Clemson University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
6 emory.edu
Emory University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
6 georgiasouthern.edu
Georgia Southern University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
6 mtu.edu
Michigan Technological University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
6 niu.edu
Northern Illinois University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
6 rice.edu
Rice University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
6 stevens.edu
Stevens Institute of Technology U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
6 ucf.edu
University of Central Florida U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
6 und.edu
University of North Dakota U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 auburn.edu
Auburn University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 boisestate.edu
Boise State University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
A
7 harvard.edu
Harvard University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
7 nyu.edu
New York University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 princeton.edu
Princeton University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
7 tsu.edu
Texas Southern University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 uci.edu
University of California-Irvine U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 umassd.edu
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 utulsa.edu
University of Tulsa U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 washu.edu
Washington University in St Louis U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 wpi.edu
Worcester Polytechnic Institute U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
8 caltech.edu
California Institute of Technology U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
8 case.edu
Case Western Reserve University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
A
8 colostate.edu
Colorado State University-Fort Collins U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
8 fau.edu
Florida Atlantic University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 fiu.edu
Florida International University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
8 okstate.edu
Oklahoma State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 oregonstate.edu
Oregon State University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
8 utdallas.edu
The University of Texas at Dallas U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 tufts.edu
Tufts University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 albany.edu
University at Albany U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
A
8 uh.edu
University of Houston U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
8 louisville.edu
University of Louisville U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
8 unr.edu
University of Nevada-Reno U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
8 charlotte.edu
University of North Carolina at Charlotte U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
8 rochester.edu
University of Rochester U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
8 vcu.edu
Virginia Commonwealth University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
9 marquette.edu
Marquette University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
9 smu.edu
Southern Methodist University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
9 berkeley.edu
University of California-Berkeley U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
9 umaine.edu
University of Maine U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
9 umd.edu
University of Maryland-College Park U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
9 unc.edu
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
10 augusta.edu
Augusta University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
10 etsu.edu
East Tennessee State University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
B
10 k-state.edu
Kansas State University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
10 msstate.edu
Mississippi State University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
10 syracuse.edu
Syracuse University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
10 tamucc.edu
Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
10 tamu.edu
Texas A&M University-College Station U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
10 uidaho.edu
University of Idaho U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
10 unh.edu
University of New Hampshire-Main Campus U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
10 unf.edu
University of North Florida U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
10 sc.edu
University of South Carolina-Columbia U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
10 uwyo.edu
University of Wyoming U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
10 wmich.edu
Western Michigan University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
11 astate.edu
Arkansas State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
11 apu.edu
Azusa Pacific University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
11 fresnostate.edu
California State University-Fresno U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
11 duke.edu
Duke University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
11 gwu.edu
George Washington University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
B
11 gatech.edu
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
B
11 gsu.edu
Georgia State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
11 latech.edu
Louisiana Tech University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
11 mtsu.edu
Middle Tennessee State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
11 pdx.edu
Portland State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
11 sdstate.edu
South Dakota State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
11 unt.edu
University of North Texas U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
11 sandiego.edu
University of San Diego U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade -
B
11 virginia.edu
University of Virginia-Main Campus U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
11 wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin-Madison U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
11 vanderbilt.edu
Vanderbilt University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
B
11 wm.edu
William & Mary U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
12 mines.edu
Colorado School of Mines U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
12 duq.edu
Duquesne University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
12 tarleton.edu
Tarleton State University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
12 temple.edu
Temple University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
12 tamuk.edu
Texas A&M University-Kingsville U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
12 uta.edu
The University of Texas at Arlington U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
12 utrgv.edu
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
12 uchicago.edu
University of Chicago U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
12 ufl.edu
University of Florida U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
12 uky.edu
University of Kentucky U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 baylor.edu
Baylor University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
13 bgsu.edu
Bowling Green State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
13 chapman.edu
Chapman University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
13 cornell.edu
Cornell University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 depaul.edu
DePaul University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
13 iit.edu
Illinois Institute of Technology U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
13 illinoisstate.edu
Illinois State University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
13 www2.lehigh.edu
Lehigh University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
13 psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
13 rit.edu
Rochester Institute of Technology U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
13 slu.edu
Saint Louis University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 sdsu.edu
San Diego State University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
13 shu.edu
Seton Hall University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 catholic.edu
The Catholic University of America U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 umt.edu
The University of Montana U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
13 arizona.edu
University of Arizona U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
13 uark.edu
University of Arkansas U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
13 umass.edu
University of Massachusetts-Amherst U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
13 upenn.edu
University of Pennsylvania U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
13 usm.edu
University of Southern Mississippi U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
13 uwm.edu
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
13 wsu.edu
Washington State University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
13 yale.edu
Yale University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
14 csulb.edu
California State University-Long Beach U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
14 cmich.edu
Central Michigan University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
14 cgu.edu
Claremont Graduate University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
B
14 fsu.edu
Florida State University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
14 fordham.edu
Fordham University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
14 howard.edu
Howard University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
14 isu.edu
Idaho State University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
14 bloomington.iu.edu
Indiana University-Bloomington U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
14 web.mit.edu
Massachusetts Institute of Technology U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
14 morgan.edu
Morgan State University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
14 njit.edu
New Jersey Institute of Technology U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
14 ncsu.edu
North Carolina State University at Raleigh U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
B
14 newark.rutgers.edu
Rutgers University-Newark U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
14 esf.edu
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
14 txst.edu
Texas State University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
14 tulane.edu
Tulane University of Louisiana U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
14 ucdavis.edu
University of California-Davis U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
14 uccs.edu
University of Colorado Colorado Springs U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
14 uml.edu
University of Massachusetts-Lowell U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
14 olemiss.edu
University of Mississippi U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
15 brown.edu
Brown University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
15 clarkson.edu
Clarkson University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
15 creighton.edu
Creighton University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
15 fit.edu
Florida Institute of Technology U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
15 iastate.edu
Iowa State University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
15 jhu.edu
Johns Hopkins University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
15 kennesaw.edu
Kennesaw State University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
15 montclair.edu
Montclair State University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
15 nau.edu
Northern Arizona University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
15 rowan.edu
Rowan University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
15 tntech.edu
Tennessee Technological University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
15 ua.edu
The University of Alabama U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
15 utep.edu
The University of Texas at El Paso U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
15 jefferson.edu
Thomas Jefferson University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
15 uakron.edu
University of Akron Main Campus U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
15 ucla.edu
University of California-Los Angeles U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
15 ucsb.edu
University of California-Santa Barbara U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
15 louisiana.edu
University of Louisiana at Lafayette U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
15 memphis.edu
University of Memphis U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
15 unlv.edu
University of Nevada-Las Vegas U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
15 uvm.edu
University of Vermont U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
15 usu.edu
Utah State University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
16 bu.edu
Boston University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade -
B
16 odu.edu
Old Dominion University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
16 rpi.edu
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
16 siu.edu
Southern Illinois University-Carbondale U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
16 ou.edu
University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
16 uoregon.edu
University of Oregon U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
16 pitt.edu
University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
16 usd.edu
University of South Dakota U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
17 csuohio.edu
Cleveland State University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
17 drexel.edu
Drexel University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
17 georgetown.edu
Georgetown University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
17 nova.edu
Nova Southeastern University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
17 shsu.edu
Sam Houston State University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
17 utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
17 utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
17 ucr.edu
University of California-Riverside U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
17 ucsd.edu
University of California-San Diego U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
17 colorado.edu
University of Colorado Boulder U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
17 washington.edu
University of Washington-Seattle Campus U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
18 byu.edu
Brigham Young University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
18 csusb.edu
California State University-San Bernardino U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
18 cau.edu
Clark Atlanta University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
18 llu.edu
Loma Linda University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
18 oakland.edu
Oakland University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
18 camden.rutgers.edu
Rutgers University-Camden U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
18 uttyler.edu
The University of Texas at Tyler U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
18 du.edu
University of Denver U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
18 missouri.edu
University of Missouri-Columbia U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
18 uncw.edu
University of North Carolina Wilmington U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
18 web.uri.edu
University of Rhode Island U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
19 home.dartmouth.edu
Dartmouth College U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
19 famu.edu
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
19 jsums.edu
Jackson State University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
19 ndsu.edu
North Dakota State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
19 tc.columbia.edu
Teachers College at Columbia University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
19 manoa.hawaii.edu
University of Hawaii at Manoa U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
19 welcome.miami.edu
University of Miami U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
19 southalabama.edu
University of South Alabama U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
19 wcupa.edu
West Chester University of Pennsylvania U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
20 bc.edu
Boston College U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
20 cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
20 lsu.edu
Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
20 nmsu.edu
New Mexico State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
20 ncat.edu
North Carolina A & T State University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
20 northwestern.edu
Northwestern University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
20 stonybrook.edu
Stony Brook University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
C
20 usf.edu
University of South Florida U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
20 utah.edu
University of Utah U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 sfsu.edu
San Francisco State University U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 uah.edu
University of Alabama in Huntsville U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 umsl.edu
University of Missouri-St Louis U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 unl.edu
University of Nebraska-Lincoln U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
21 vt.edu
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
21 wright.edu
Wright State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
22 csueastbay.edu
California State University-East Bay U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
22 mst.edu
Missouri University of Science and Technology U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
22 uic.edu
University of Illinois Chicago U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
C
22 unomaha.edu
University of Nebraska at Omaha U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 ohio.edu
Ohio University-Main Campus U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
C
23 udayton.edu
University of Dayton U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 uga.edu
University of Georgia U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
C
23 unm.edu
University of New Mexico-Main Campus U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
23 wichita.edu
Wichita State University U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
24 asu.edu
Arizona State University Digital Immersion U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
24 msu.edu
Michigan State University U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
C
24 buffalo.edu
University at Buffalo U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
24 uaf.edu
University of Alaska Fairbanks U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
25 osu.edu
Ohio State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 27
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
25 udel.edu
University of Delaware U.S. rank 27
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
C
26 uprrp.edu
University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras U.S. rank 28
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
C
27 uab.edu
University of Alabama at Birmingham U.S. rank 29
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
28 ttu.edu
Texas Tech University U.S. rank 32
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
D
29 montana.edu
Montana State University U.S. rank 35
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
D
30 liu.edu
Long Island University U.S. rank 38
  • Accessibility grade F
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
D
jmu.edu
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 404 -
ualr.edu
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 404 -
american.edu
American University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
bsu.edu
Ball State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
fullerton.edu
California State University-Fullerton
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
columbia.edu
Columbia University in the City of New York
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
ccny.cuny.edu
CUNY City College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
gc.cuny.edu
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
emich.edu
Eastern Michigan University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
gmu.edu
George Mason University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
iup.edu
Indiana University of Pennsylvania-Main Campus
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
kent.edu
Kent State University at Kent
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
pvamu.edu
Prairie View A & M University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 -
newbrunswick.rutgers.edu
Rutgers University-New Brunswick
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
subr.edu
Southern University and A & M College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
tnstate.edu
Tennessee State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
newschool.edu
The New School
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
ucmerced.edu
University of California-Merced
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
ucsc.edu
University of California-Santa Cruz
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
uc.edu
University of Cincinnati-Main Campus
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
umes.edu
University of Maryland Eastern Shore
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
umich.edu
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
new.uno.edu
University of New Orleans
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because its security certificate didn't pass validation. Status 993 -
uncg.edu
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because the page never finished loading in our browser. Status 994 -
utoledo.edu
University of Toledo
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
wvu.edu
West Virginia University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 26 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo