United Athletic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 9 United Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the United Athletic Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 84

Average overall score of 8 fully scanned United Athletic Conference member sites

8th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

8 of 9

United athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How United Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned United Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • United Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How United Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 894
90 to 1002

United Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. United Athletic Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. United Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 25% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 75% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
United Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
United Athletic Conference25% (2)75% (6)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

United Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 8 fully scanned United Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility95All education: 91
  2. Botability86All education: 89
  3. Security83All education: 85
  4. Usability62All education: 68
  5. Readability63All education: 56
  • United Athletic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
United Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorUnited Athletic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9591
Botability8689
Security8385
Usability6268
Readability6356

Top 3 United Athletic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in United Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Eastern Kentucky University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in United Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 10

Abilene Christian University

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in United Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 14

Tarleton State University

B 87 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check United Athletic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

United Athletic Conference members by overall score

United Athletic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 eku.edu
Eastern Kentucky University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
2 acu.edu
Abilene Christian University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 tarleton.edu
Tarleton State University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
3 uta.edu
The University of Texas at Arlington U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
4 apsu.edu
Austin Peay State University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
5 una.edu
University of North Alabama U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
6 westga.edu
University of West Georgia U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
7 uca.edu
University of Central Arkansas U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
ualr.edu
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 404 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo