Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 14 Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 14
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 85

Average overall score of 14 fully scanned Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference member sites

7th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

14 of 14

Rocky mountain athletic conference member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 14 fully scanned Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 14 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 899
90 to 1003

Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference: 14 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Rocky Mountain Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 21% (3 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 79% (11 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference21% (3)79% (11)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 14 fully scanned Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility91All education: 91
  2. Botability94All education: 89
  3. Security85All education: 85
  4. Usability64All education: 68
  5. Readability57All education: 56
  • Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorRocky Mountain Athletic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9191
Botability9489
Security8585
Usability6468
Readability5756

Top 3 Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 7

Black Hills State University

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Western Colorado University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#3 in Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 10

Metropolitan State University of Denver

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference members by overall score

Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 bhsu.edu
Black Hills State University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
2 western.edu
Western Colorado University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
3 msudenver.edu
Metropolitan State University of Denver U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 adams.edu
Adams State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
5 mines.edu
Colorado School of Mines U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
6 uccs.edu
University of Colorado Colorado Springs U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
7 ccu.edu
Colorado Christian University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
7 coloradomesa.edu
Colorado Mesa University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
8 sdsmt.edu
U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
8 nmhu.edu
New Mexico Highlands University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
9 csupueblo.edu
Colorado State University Pueblo U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
9 regis.edu
Regis University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
10 csc.edu
Chadron State College U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
11 fortlewis.edu
Fort Lewis College U.S. rank 27
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo