North Atlantic Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 5 North Atlantic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 5
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing North Atlantic Conference member sites. All education sites

Members of the North Atlantic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 73

Average usability score of 5 fully scanned North Atlantic Conference member sites

9th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

5 of 5

North atlantic conference member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How North Atlantic Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 5 fully scanned North Atlantic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • North Atlantic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 591
60 to 691
70 to 791
80 to 891
90 to 1001

North Atlantic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. North Atlantic Conference: 5 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. North Atlantic Conference
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
North Atlantic Conference20% (1)40% (2)40% (2)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 North Atlantic Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in North Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Vermont State University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in North Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 10

University of Maine at Presque Isle

B 80 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in North Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 13

Husson University

C 75 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among North Atlantic Conference member sites

Share of the 5 fully scanned North Atlantic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt80%
  2. Open Graph description60%
  3. Open Graph image60%
  4. First Contentful Paint (FCP)40%
  5. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)40%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt80%4
Open Graph description60%3
Open Graph image60%3
First Contentful Paint (FCP)40%2
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)40%2

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.

Every education site with one problem

North Atlantic Conference members by usability score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 vermontstate.edu
Vermont State University U.S. rank 2 		15 of 16 checks pass A
2 umpi.edu
University of Maine at Presque Isle U.S. rank 10 		12 of 15 checks pass B
3 husson.edu
Husson University U.S. rank 13 		12 of 16 checks pass C
4 mainemaritime.edu
Maine Maritime Academy U.S. rank 20 		10 of 16 checks pass D
5 lesley.edu
Lesley University U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo