North Atlantic Conference: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 5 North Atlantic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 5
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the North Atlantic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 92

Average botability score of 5 fully scanned North Atlantic Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

5 of 5

North atlantic conference member sites fully scanned

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How North Atlantic Conference botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 5 fully scanned North Atlantic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 5 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • North Atlantic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How North Atlantic Conference botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 891
90 to 1004

North Atlantic Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. North Atlantic Conference: 5 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. North Atlantic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 80% (4 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 20% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
North Atlantic Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
North Atlantic Conference80% (4)20% (1)0% (0)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 North Atlantic Conference member sites by botability score

#1 in North Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Husson University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#1 in North Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Vermont State University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in North Atlantic Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Lesley University

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among North Atlantic Conference member sites

Share of the 5 fully scanned North Atlantic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Sitemap in robots.txt40% (2 of 5 sites)
  2. Link text40% (2 of 5 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among North Atlantic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Sitemap in robots.txt40%2
Link text40%2

What each check means

  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.

Every education site with one problem

North Atlantic Conference members by botability score

North Atlantic Conference members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 husson.edu
Husson University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 vermontstate.edu
Vermont State University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 lesley.edu
Lesley University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 umpi.edu
University of Maine at Presque Isle U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 mainemaritime.edu
Maine Maritime Academy U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo