New Jersey Athletic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 10 New Jersey Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 10
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the New Jersey Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 82

Average overall score of 9 fully scanned New Jersey Athletic Conference member sites

10th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

9 of 10

New jersey athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How New Jersey Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned New Jersey Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • New Jersey Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How New Jersey Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 898
90 to 1000

New Jersey Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. New Jersey Athletic Conference: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. New Jersey Athletic ConferenceB to C (70 to 89): 100% (9 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
New Jersey Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
New Jersey Athletic Conference0% (0)100% (9)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

New Jersey Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 9 fully scanned New Jersey Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility94All education: 91
  2. Botability81All education: 89
  3. Security86All education: 85
  4. Usability58All education: 68
  5. Readability33All education: 56
  • New Jersey Athletic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
New Jersey Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorNew Jersey Athletic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9491
Botability8189
Security8685
Usability5868
Readability3356

Top 3 New Jersey Athletic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in New Jersey Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 16

Ramapo College of New Jersey

B 85 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in New Jersey Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 16

Rutgers University-Newark

B 85 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability F

#1 in New Jersey Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 16

William Paterson University of New Jersey

B 85 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check New Jersey Athletic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

New Jersey Athletic Conference members by overall score

New Jersey Athletic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 ramapo.edu
Ramapo College of New Jersey U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
1 newark.rutgers.edu
Rutgers University-Newark U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
1 wpunj.edu
William Paterson University of New Jersey U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
2 montclair.edu
Montclair State University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
2 rowan.edu
Rowan University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
3 kean.edu
Kean University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
4 camden.rutgers.edu
Rutgers University-Camden U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
4 stockton.edu
Stockton University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
5 newpaltz.edu
State University of New York at New Paltz U.S. rank 30
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
tcnj.edu
The College of New Jersey
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 10/30/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo