Mountain East Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Mountain East Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Mountain East Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 86

Average overall score of 11 fully scanned Mountain East Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

11 of 12

Mountain east conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Mountain East Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 11 fully scanned Mountain East Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 11 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Mountain East Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Mountain East Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 895
90 to 1004

Mountain East Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mountain East Conference: 11 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Mountain East ConferenceA (90 to 100): 36% (4 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 64% (7 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Mountain East Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Mountain East Conference36% (4)64% (7)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Mountain East Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 11 fully scanned Mountain East Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility91All education: 91
  2. Botability89All education: 89
  3. Security85All education: 85
  4. Usability75All education: 68
  5. Readability60All education: 56
  • Mountain East Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Mountain East Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorMountain East Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9191
Botability8989
Security8585
Usability7568
Readability6056

Top 3 Mountain East Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Mountain East Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Point Park University

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Mountain East Conference · U.S. education rank 10

Davis & Elkins College

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#2 in Mountain East Conference · U.S. education rank 10

University of Charleston

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Mountain East Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Mountain East Conference members by overall score

Mountain East Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 pointpark.edu
Point Park University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
2 dewv.edu
Davis & Elkins College U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
2 ucwv.edu
University of Charleston U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 westliberty.edu
West Liberty University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
3 wvstateu.edu
West Virginia State University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
4 concord.edu
Concord University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
5 shawnee.edu
Shawnee State University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
6 fairmontstate.edu
Fairmont State University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
7 wheeling.edu
Wheeling University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade -
B
8 wvwc.edu
West Virginia Wesleyan College U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
C
9 frostburg.edu
Frostburg State University U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
C
glenville.edu
Glenville State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo