Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 9 Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 89

Average overall score of 8 fully scanned Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom member sites

3rd

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

8 of 9

Middle atlantic conference freedom member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 894
90 to 1004

Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Middle Atlantic Conference FreedomA (90 to 100): 50% (4 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 50% (4 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom50% (4)50% (4)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 8 fully scanned Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility92All education: 91
  2. Botability98All education: 89
  3. Security89All education: 85
  4. Usability75All education: 68
  5. Readability63All education: 56
  • Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom
  • All education
View the data table
Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorMiddle Atlantic Conference Freedom averageAll education average
Accessibility9291
Botability9889
Security8985
Usability7568
Readability6356

Top 3 Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom member sites by overall score

#1 in Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom · U.S. education rank 8

Lebanon Valley College

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#1 in Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom · U.S. education rank 8

Stevens Institute of Technology

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom · U.S. education rank 9

King's College

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom members by overall score

Middle Atlantic Conference Freedom members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 lvc.edu
Lebanon Valley College U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
1 stevens.edu
Stevens Institute of Technology U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
2 kings.edu
King's College U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
3 fdu.edu
Fairleigh Dickinson University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 arcadia.edu
Arcadia University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
5 misericordia.edu
Misericordia University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
6 desales.edu
DeSales University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
7 marywood.edu
Marywood University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
delval.edu
Delaware Valley University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo