Metro Conference websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Metro Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Metro Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 88

Average overall score of 10 fully scanned Metro Conference member sites

4th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

10 of 11

Metro conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Metro Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Metro Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Metro Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Metro Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 894
90 to 1005

Metro Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Metro Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Metro ConferenceA (90 to 100): 50% (5 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 50% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Metro Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Metro Conference50% (5)50% (5)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Metro Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 10 fully scanned Metro Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility95All education: 91
  2. Botability92All education: 89
  3. Security80All education: 85
  4. Usability78All education: 68
  5. Readability60All education: 56
  • Metro Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Metro Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorMetro Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9591
Botability9289
Security8085
Usability7868
Readability6056

Top 3 Metro Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Metro Conference · U.S. education rank 7

Fairfield University

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Metro Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Manhattan University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#3 in Metro Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Iona University

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Metro Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Metro Conference members by overall score

Metro Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 fairfield.edu
Fairfield University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 manhattan.edu
Manhattan University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
3 iona.edu
Iona University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 siena.edu
Siena College U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 merrimack.edu
Merrimack College U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
A
6 marist.edu
Marist University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
6 niagara.edu
Niagara University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
7 sacredheart.edu
Sacred Heart University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
8 rider.edu
Rider University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
9 canisius.edu
Canisius University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
msmary.edu
Mount St. Mary's University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo