Showing California Collegiate Athletic Association member sites. All education sites
Members of the California Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
B 85
Average overall score of 12 fully scanned California Collegiate Athletic Association member sites
7th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score
12 of 15
California collegiate athletic association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 3, so they're listed without grades
B 85
Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How California Collegiate Athletic Association overall scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned California Collegiate Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- California Collegiate Athletic Association average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 2 |
| 80 to 89 | 6 |
| 90 to 100 | 4 |
California Collegiate Athletic Association by overall grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. California Collegiate Athletic Association: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| California Collegiate Athletic Association | 33% (4) | 67% (8) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 25% (659) | 73% (1,965) | 2% (63) |
California Collegiate Athletic Association average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
Average of the 12 fully scanned California Collegiate Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.
- California Collegiate Athletic Association
- All education
View the data table
| Indicator | California Collegiate Athletic Association average | All education average |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | 96 | 91 |
| Botability | 87 | 89 |
| Security | 85 | 85 |
| Usability | 58 | 68 |
| Readability | 58 | 56 |
Top 3 California Collegiate Athletic Association member sites by overall score
#1 in California Collegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 6
Menlo College
A 95 overall
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability A
- Readability F
#2 in California Collegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 9
California State University-Monterey Bay
A 92 overall
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability A
#2 in California Collegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 9
Fresno Pacific University
A 92 overall
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
Most common failures by indicator
The check California Collegiate Athletic Association member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.
- 25% (3 of 12 sites) fail this accessibility check: Frame or iframe elements have a title. Embedded frames have titles so screen readers can describe their content. More accessibility failures.
- 42% (5 of 12 sites) fail this botability check: Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. More botability failures.
- 67% (8 of 12 sites) fail this security check: X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. More security failures.
- 92% (11 of 12 sites) fail this usability check: Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. More usability failures.
- 42% (5 of 12 sites) fail this readability check: Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. More readability failures.
California Collegiate Athletic Association members by overall score
| Rank | Site | Indicator grades | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
menlo.edu
Menlo College U.S. rank 6 |
|
A |
| 2 |
csumb.edu
California State University-Monterey Bay U.S. rank 9 |
|
A |
| 2 |
fresno.edu
Fresno Pacific University U.S. rank 9 |
|
A |
| 3 |
humboldt.edu
California State Polytechnic University-Humboldt U.S. rank 11 |
|
A |
| 4 |
sonoma.edu
Sonoma State University U.S. rank 17 |
|
B |
| 5 |
cpp.edu
California State Polytechnic University-Pomona U.S. rank 18 |
|
B |
| 6 |
csuchico.edu
California State University-Chico U.S. rank 19 |
|
B |
| 7 |
calstatela.edu
California State University-Los Angeles U.S. rank 20 |
|
B |
| 7 |
csusb.edu
California State University-San Bernardino U.S. rank 20 |
|
B |
| 8 |
csustan.edu
California State University-Stanislaus U.S. rank 21 |
|
B |
| 9 |
sfsu.edu
San Francisco State University U.S. rank 23 |
|
C |
| 10 |
csueastbay.edu
California State University-East Bay U.S. rank 24 |
|
C |
|
csudh.edu
California State University-Dominguez Hills |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
csusm.edu
California State University-San Marcos |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 408 | - | |
|
ucmerced.edu
University of California-Merced |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - |
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 3 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.