Showing Big Sky Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Big Sky Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
D 63
Average usability score of 10 fully scanned Big Sky Conference member sites
19th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
10 of 10
Big sky conference member sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Big Sky Conference usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Big Sky Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Big Sky Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 | 1 |
| 50 to 59 | 1 |
| 60 to 69 | 4 |
| 70 to 79 | 2 |
| 80 to 89 | 1 |
| 90 to 100 | 0 |
Big Sky Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Big Sky Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big Sky Conference | 0% (0) | 30% (3) | 70% (7) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Big Sky Conference member sites by usability score
#1 in Big Sky Conference · U.S. education rank 5
University of Northern Colorado
B 86 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability F
#2 in Big Sky Conference · U.S. education rank 14
Portland State University
C 73 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability C
- Readability A
#2 in Big Sky Conference · U.S. education rank 14
Southern Utah University
C 73 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability C
- Readability A
What each check means
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Big Sky Conference members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
unco.edu
University of Northern Colorado U.S. rank 5 |
13 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
pdx.edu
Portland State University U.S. rank 14 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 2 |
suu.edu
Southern Utah University U.S. rank 14 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
utahtech.edu
Utah Tech University U.S. rank 17 |
11 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 4 |
isu.edu
Idaho State University U.S. rank 18 |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 4 |
umt.edu
The University of Montana U.S. rank 18 |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 4 |
uidaho.edu
University of Idaho U.S. rank 18 |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 5 |
nau.edu
Northern Arizona University U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
weber.edu
Weber State University U.S. rank 29 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 7 |
montana.edu
Montana State University U.S. rank 33 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 10/28/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.