Big Sky Conference websites: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 10 Big Sky Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 10
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Big Sky Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

F 40

Average readability score of 10 fully scanned Big Sky Conference member sites

26th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score

10 of 10

Big sky conference member sites fully scanned

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Big Sky Conference readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Big Sky Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Big Sky Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Big Sky Conference readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 96
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1004

Big Sky Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Big Sky Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Big Sky ConferenceA (90 to 100): 40% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 60% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Big Sky Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Big Sky Conference40% (4)0% (0)60% (6)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 Big Sky Conference member sites by readability score

#1 in Big Sky Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Montana State University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility C
  • Botability C
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Big Sky Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Portland State University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#1 in Big Sky Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Southern Utah University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common readability failures among Big Sky Conference member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned Big Sky Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level60% (6 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among Big Sky Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level60%6

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

Big Sky Conference members by readability score

Big Sky Conference members ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 montana.edu
Montana State University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 pdx.edu
Portland State University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 suu.edu
Southern Utah University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 utahtech.edu
Utah Tech University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
2 isu.edu
Idaho State University U.S. rank 84
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 nau.edu
Northern Arizona University U.S. rank 98
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 umt.edu
The University of Montana U.S. rank 74
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 uidaho.edu
University of Idaho U.S. rank 48
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 unco.edu
University of Northern Colorado U.S. rank 68
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 weber.edu
Weber State University U.S. rank 164
0 of 1 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 10/28/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo