BIG EAST Conference websites: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 10 BIG EAST Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 10
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the BIG EAST Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 70

Average readability score of 10 fully scanned BIG EAST Conference member sites

9th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score

10 of 10

Big east conference member sites fully scanned

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How BIG EAST Conference readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned BIG EAST Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • BIG EAST Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How BIG EAST Conference readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 93
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1007

BIG EAST Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. BIG EAST Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. BIG EAST ConferenceA (90 to 100): 70% (7 sites)D to F (below 70): 30% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
BIG EAST Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
BIG EAST Conference70% (7)0% (0)30% (3)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 BIG EAST Conference member sites by readability score

#1 in BIG EAST Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Butler University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in BIG EAST Conference · U.S. education rank 1

DePaul University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#1 in BIG EAST Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Georgetown University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common readability failures among BIG EAST Conference member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned BIG EAST Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level30% (3 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among BIG EAST Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level30%3

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

BIG EAST Conference members by readability score

BIG EAST Conference members ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 butler.edu
Butler University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 depaul.edu
DePaul University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 georgetown.edu
Georgetown University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 marquette.edu
Marquette University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 shu.edu
Seton Hall University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 stjohns.edu
St. John's University-New York U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 xavier.edu
Xavier University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
2 creighton.edu
Creighton University U.S. rank 104
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 providence.edu
Providence College U.S. rank 18
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 uconn.edu
University of Connecticut U.S. rank 12
0 of 1 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo