Showing South Carolina county sites. All U.S. county sites
B 88
Average accessibility score of 39 fully scanned South Carolina county sites
8th
of 49 states, ranked by average accessibility score
39 of 46
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 7, so they're listed without grades
B 88
U.S. county average accessibility score, 2467 fully scanned sites
South Carolina's state site, sc.gov, ranks 23rd of 51 state sites with a C. State rankings.
How South Carolina county accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 39 fully scanned South Carolina county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 39 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- South Carolina average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 1 |
| 60 to 69 | 2 |
| 70 to 79 | 3 |
| 80 to 89 | 15 |
| 90 to 100 | 18 |
South Carolina counties by accessibility grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
South Carolina counties by accessibility grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. South Carolina: 39 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | 46% (18) | 46% (18) | 8% (3) |
| All U.S. counties | 49% (1,201) | 49% (1,197) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 South Carolina county sites by accessibility score
#1 in South Carolina · U.S. rank 1
Bamberg County, SC
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security B
- Usability C
- Readability A
#1 in South Carolina · U.S. rank 1
Chesterfield County, SC
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security B
- Usability C
- Readability A
#1 in South Carolina · U.S. rank 1
Newberry County, SC
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability F
- Security C
- Usability D
- Readability A
What each check means
- Links have a discernible name. Links have unique, descriptive text so users know where they go. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio. Text and background colors meet minimum contrast ratios. Users with low vision cannot read your text.
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents. Interactive elements are not hidden from screen reader users. Keyboard users can focus elements that screen readers cannot announce.
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order. Page headings follow a logical order without skipping levels. Keyboard users cannot efficiently navigate your site.
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. Buttons and interactive elements are large enough to tap easily on touch screens. Users with motor disabilities struggle to tap small buttons.
All South Carolina county sites by accessibility score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
bambergcounty.sc.gov
Bamberg County, SC U.S. rank 1 |
32 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
chesterfieldcountysc.com
Chesterfield County, SC U.S. rank 1 |
29 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
newberrycounty.gov
Newberry County, SC U.S. rank 1 |
31 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
richlandcountysc.gov
Richland County, SC U.S. rank 1 |
34 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
greenwoodcounty-sc.gov
Greenwood County, SC U.S. rank 2 |
33 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
charlestoncounty.gov
Charleston County, SC U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
colletoncounty.org
Colleton County, SC U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
fairfieldsc.com
Fairfield County, SC U.S. rank 3 |
32 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
sumtercountysc.gov
Sumter County, SC U.S. rank 5 |
33 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
abbevillecountysc.com
Abbeville County, SC U.S. rank 6 |
30 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
clarendoncountysc.gov
Clarendon County, SC U.S. rank 6 |
30 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
darcosc.com
Darlington County, SC U.S. rank 6 |
31 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
jaspercountysc.gov
Jasper County, SC U.S. rank 6 |
31 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
aikencountysc.gov
Aiken County, SC U.S. rank 7 |
35 of 38 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
saludacounty.sc.gov
Saluda County, SC U.S. rank 7 |
25 of 27 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
laurenscountysc.gov
Laurens County, SC U.S. rank 8 |
31 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
co.pickens.sc.us
Pickens County, SC U.S. rank 8 |
31 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 8 |
dilloncountysc.org
Dillon County, SC U.S. rank 9 |
27 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 9 |
andersoncountysc.org
Anderson County, SC U.S. rank 10 |
34 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
calhouncounty.sc.gov
Calhoun County, SC U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
williamsburgcounty.sc.gov
Williamsburg County, SC U.S. rank 10 |
34 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
gtcountysc.gov
Georgetown County, SC U.S. rank 11 |
32 of 36 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
hamptoncountysc.org
Hampton County, SC U.S. rank 11 |
30 of 34 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
lancastercountysc.gov
Lancaster County, SC U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
lex-co.sc.gov
Lexington County, SC U.S. rank 13 |
25 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
marlborocounty.sc.gov
Marlboro County, SC U.S. rank 13 |
26 of 30 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
orangeburgcounty.org
Orangeburg County, SC U.S. rank 13 |
33 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
leecountysc.org
Lee County, SC U.S. rank 14 |
30 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 13 |
florencecountysc.gov
Florence County, SC U.S. rank 15 |
22 of 26 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
barnwellcountysc.us
Barnwell County, SC U.S. rank 16 |
31 of 37 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
cherokeecountysc.gov
Cherokee County, SC U.S. rank 16 |
25 of 30 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
horrycountysc.gov
Horry County, SC U.S. rank 17 |
24 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 16 |
marionsc.org
Marion County, SC U.S. rank 19 |
25 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 17 |
oconeesc.com
Oconee County, SC U.S. rank 21 |
25 of 32 checks pass | C |
| 18 |
gearupunionsc.com
Union County, SC U.S. rank 22 |
14 of 18 checks pass | C |
| 19 |
mccormickcountysc.org
McCormick County, SC U.S. rank 23 |
26 of 34 checks pass | C |
| 20 |
beaufortcountysc.gov
Beaufort County, SC U.S. rank 31 |
22 of 32 checks pass | D |
| 21 |
chestercountysc.gov
Chester County, SC U.S. rank 33 |
12 of 18 checks pass | D |
| 22 |
greenvillecounty.org
Greenville County, SC U.S. rank 41 |
10 of 18 checks pass | F |
|
allendalecounty.com
Allendale County, SC |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
berkeleycountysc.gov
Berkeley County, SC |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
dorchestercountysc.gov
Dorchester County, SC |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
edgefieldcounty.sc.gov
Edgefield County, SC |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 | - | |
|
kershaw.sc.gov
Kershaw County, SC |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
spartanburgcounty.gov
Spartanburg County, SC |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
yorkcountysc.gov
York County, SC |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in South Carolina. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/24/2026 and 11/6/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 7 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.