Showing Mississippi county sites. All U.S. county sites
B 87
Average accessibility score of 64 fully scanned Mississippi county sites
9th
of 49 states, ranked by average accessibility score
64 of 72
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 8, so they're listed without grades
B 88
U.S. county average accessibility score, 2467 fully scanned sites
Mississippi's state site, mississippi.gov, ranks 22nd of 51 state sites with a C. State rankings.
How Mississippi county accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 64 fully scanned Mississippi county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 64 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Mississippi average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 2 |
| 70 to 79 | 5 |
| 80 to 89 | 35 |
| 90 to 100 | 22 |
Mississippi counties by accessibility grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
- No site on our list
Mississippi counties by accessibility grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mississippi: 64 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | 34% (22) | 63% (40) | 3% (2) |
| All U.S. counties | 49% (1,201) | 49% (1,197) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Mississippi county sites by accessibility score
#1 in Mississippi · U.S. rank 1
Benton County, MS
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability A
#1 in Mississippi · U.S. rank 1
Madison County, MS
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability D
- Security D
- Usability F
- Readability F
#1 in Mississippi · U.S. rank 1
Sunflower County, MS
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability D
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability F
What each check means
- Links have a discernible name. Links have unique, descriptive text so users know where they go. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Image elements have [alt] attributes. Images have descriptive alt text or are marked as decorative. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Document has a main landmark. The page has exactly one main content area so screen readers can navigate to it. Screen reader users cannot skip directly to main content.
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio. Text and background colors meet minimum contrast ratios. Users with low vision cannot read your text.
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order. Page headings follow a logical order without skipping levels. Keyboard users cannot efficiently navigate your site.
All Mississippi county sites by accessibility score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
bentoncountyms.gov
Benton County, MS U.S. rank 1 |
33 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
madison-co.com
Madison County, MS U.S. rank 1 |
22 of 22 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
sunflowercounty.ms.gov
Sunflower County, MS U.S. rank 1 |
31 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
tatecountyms.gov
Tate County, MS U.S. rank 1 |
35 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
tunicacountymississippi.com
Tunica County, MS U.S. rank 1 |
29 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
covingtoncountyms.gov
Covington County, MS U.S. rank 3 |
26 of 27 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
co.tishomingo.ms.us
Tishomingo County, MS U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
walthallchamber.com
Walthall County, MS U.S. rank 5 |
17 of 18 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
alcorncounty.org
Alcorn County, MS U.S. rank 6 |
27 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
greenecountyms.gov
Greene County, MS U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
stonecountyms.gov
Stone County, MS U.S. rank 6 |
30 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
newtoncountyms.net
Newton County, MS U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
smithcountyms.gov
Smith County, MS U.S. rank 7 |
25 of 27 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
co.jackson.ms.us
Jackson County, MS U.S. rank 8 |
34 of 37 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
panolacoms.com
Panola County, MS U.S. rank 8 |
22 of 24 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
pearlrivercounty.net
Pearl River County, MS U.S. rank 8 |
34 of 37 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
adamscountyms.net
Adams County, MS U.S. rank 9 |
27 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
desotocountyms.gov
DeSoto County, MS U.S. rank 9 |
29 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
holmescountyms.org
Holmes County, MS U.S. rank 9 |
18 of 20 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
humphreyscountyms.com
Humphreys County, MS U.S. rank 9 |
29 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
leecountyms.com
Lee County, MS U.S. rank 9 |
30 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
wilkinson.co.ms.gov
Wilkinson County, MS U.S. rank 9 |
19 of 21 checks pass | A |
| 8 |
ccmsgov.us
Claiborne County, MS U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
kempercountyms.gov
Kemper County, MS U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
lauderdalecounty.org
Lauderdale County, MS U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
leflorecounty.ms
Leflore County, MS U.S. rank 10 |
25 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
co.tippah.ms.us
Tippah County, MS U.S. rank 10 |
25 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
monroems.com
Monroe County, MS U.S. rank 11 |
22 of 25 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
lafayettems.com
Lafayette County, MS U.S. rank 12 |
27 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
leakecountyms.org
Leake County, MS U.S. rank 12 |
29 of 33 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
oktibbeha.ms.gov
Oktibbeha County, MS U.S. rank 12 |
27 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
coahomacounty.net
Coahoma County, MS U.S. rank 13 |
26 of 30 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
neshobacounty.net
Neshoba County, MS U.S. rank 13 |
20 of 23 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
prentisscounty.org
Prentiss County, MS U.S. rank 13 |
19 of 22 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
attalacounty.net
Attala County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
claycountyms.com
Clay County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
hancockcounty.ms.gov
Hancock County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
30 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
jeffersoncountyms.com
Jefferson County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
lowndescountyms.com
Lowndes County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
29 of 34 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
marshall-county.com
Marshall County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
montgomerycountyms.com
Montgomery County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
noxubeecounty.org
Noxubee County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
23 of 27 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
sharkeycounty.net
Sharkey County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
waynecounty.ms
Wayne County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
yalobushaonline.org
Yalobusha County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
yazoocounty.net
Yazoo County, MS U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 13 |
co.bolivar.ms.us
Bolivar County, MS U.S. rank 15 |
21 of 25 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
amitecounty.ms
Amite County, MS U.S. rank 16 |
10 of 12 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
itawamba.gov
Itawamba County, MS U.S. rank 16 |
20 of 24 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
golincolnms.com
Lincoln County, MS U.S. rank 16 |
20 of 24 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
marioncountyms.com
Marion County, MS U.S. rank 17 |
19 of 23 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
scottcountyms.gov
Scott County, MS U.S. rank 17 |
19 of 23 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
washingtoncounty.ms
Washington County, MS U.S. rank 17 |
19 of 23 checks pass | B |
| 16 |
perrycountyms.gov
Perry County, MS U.S. rank 18 |
26 of 32 checks pass | B |
| 17 |
clarkecountyms.gov
Clarke County, MS U.S. rank 19 |
24 of 30 checks pass | B |
| 17 |
co.jasper.ms.us
Jasper County, MS U.S. rank 19 |
25 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 17 |
lamarcountyms.gov
Lamar County, MS U.S. rank 19 |
21 of 26 checks pass | B |
| 18 |
co.jefferson-davis.ms.us
Jefferson Davis County, MS U.S. rank 20 |
23 of 29 checks pass | C |
| 19 |
forrestcountyms.us
Forrest County, MS U.S. rank 21 |
22 of 28 checks pass | C |
| 20 |
winstoncountyms.org
Winston County, MS U.S. rank 22 |
14 of 18 checks pass | C |
| 21 |
webstercountyms.org
Webster County, MS U.S. rank 23 |
13 of 17 checks pass | C |
| 22 |
carrollcountyms.org
Carroll County, MS U.S. rank 29 |
19 of 27 checks pass | C |
| 23 |
georgecountyms.com
George County, MS U.S. rank 35 |
11 of 17 checks pass | D |
| 24 |
simpsoncountyms.com
Simpson County, MS U.S. rank 38 |
8 of 13 checks pass | D |
|
copiahcountyms.gov
Copiah County, MS |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 503 | - | |
|
franklincoms.weebly.com
Franklin County, MS |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 404 | - | |
|
harrisoncountyms.gov
Harrison County, MS |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
hindscountyms.com
Hinds County, MS |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 503 | - | |
|
jonescountyms.com
Jones County, MS |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
quitmancountyms.org
Quitman County, MS |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
rankincounty.org
Rankin County, MS |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 | - | |
|
unioncoms.com
Union County, MS |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Mississippi. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/2/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 8 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.