Showing Louisiana county sites. All U.S. county sites
B 86
Average accessibility score of 41 fully scanned Louisiana county sites
10th
of 49 states, ranked by average accessibility score
41 of 49
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 8, so they're listed without grades
B 88
U.S. county average accessibility score, 2467 fully scanned sites
Louisiana's state site, louisiana.gov, ranks 19th of 51 state sites with a C. State rankings.
How Louisiana county accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 41 fully scanned Louisiana county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 41 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Louisiana average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 2 |
| 70 to 79 | 3 |
| 80 to 89 | 23 |
| 90 to 100 | 13 |
Louisiana counties by accessibility grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
- No site on our list
Louisiana counties by accessibility grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Louisiana: 41 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | 32% (13) | 63% (26) | 5% (2) |
| All U.S. counties | 49% (1,201) | 49% (1,197) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Louisiana county sites by accessibility score
#1 in Louisiana · U.S. rank 1
Ascension Parish, LA
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability D
- Readability F
#2 in Louisiana · U.S. rank 2
St. John the Baptist Parish, LA
A 97 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability D
- Readability A
#3 in Louisiana · U.S. rank 3
Avoyelles Parish, LA
A 96 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability D
- Readability A
What each check means
- Links have a discernible name. Links have unique, descriptive text so users know where they go. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order. Page headings follow a logical order without skipping levels. Keyboard users cannot efficiently navigate your site.
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio. Text and background colors meet minimum contrast ratios. Users with low vision cannot read your text.
- Image elements have [alt] attributes. Images have descriptive alt text or are marked as decorative. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Document has a main landmark. The page has exactly one main content area so screen readers can navigate to it. Screen reader users cannot skip directly to main content.
All Louisiana county sites by accessibility score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
ascensionparish.net
Ascension Parish, LA U.S. rank 1 |
32 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
sjbparish.gov
St. John the Baptist Parish, LA U.S. rank 2 |
36 of 37 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
avoypj.org
Avoyelles Parish, LA U.S. rank 3 |
32 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
lincolnparish.gov
Lincoln Parish, LA U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
oppj.org
Ouachita Parish, LA U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
stpgov.org
St. Tammany Parish, LA U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
wfparish.org
West Feliciana Parish, LA U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
bossierparishla.gov
Bossier Parish, LA U.S. rank 4 |
23 of 24 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
stjamesla.com
St. James Parish, LA U.S. rank 5 |
36 of 38 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
stmartinparish.net
Saint Martin Parish, LA U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
iberiaparishgovernment.com
Iberia Parish, LA U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
jacksonparishpolicejury.org
Jackson Parish, LA U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 8 |
jeffdavis.org
Jefferson Davis Parish, LA U.S. rank 8 |
31 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 9 |
plaqueminesparish.gov
Plaquemines Parish, LA U.S. rank 10 |
34 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
tpcg.org
Terrebonne Parish, LA U.S. rank 10 |
25 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
wbrparish.org
West Baton Rouge Parish, LA U.S. rank 10 |
33 of 37 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
rppj.com
Rapides Parish, LA U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
vppjla.com
Vernon Parish, LA U.S. rank 11 |
24 of 27 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
claiborneone.org
Claiborne Parish, LA U.S. rank 12 |
27 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
assumptionla.com
Assumption Parish, LA U.S. rank 13 |
32 of 37 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
desotoppj.com
DeSoto Parish, LA U.S. rank 13 |
33 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
sbpg.net
Saint Bernard Parish, LA U.S. rank 13 |
33 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 13 |
caddo.gov
Caddo Parish, LA U.S. rank 14 |
29 of 34 checks pass | B |
| 13 |
madisonparish.org
Madison Parish, LA U.S. rank 14 |
12 of 14 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
jeffparish.gov
Jefferson Parish, LA U.S. rank 15 |
32 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
sabineparishpolicejury.com
Sabine Parish, LA U.S. rank 15 |
22 of 26 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
wpgov.org
Washington Parish, LA U.S. rank 15 |
28 of 33 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
conppj.org
Concordia Parish, LA U.S. rank 16 |
15 of 18 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
ibervilleparish.com
Iberville Parish, LA U.S. rank 16 |
26 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
lafourchegov.org
Lafourche Parish, LA U.S. rank 16 |
25 of 30 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
pcparish.org
Pointe Coupee Parish, LA U.S. rank 16 |
26 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
stmaryparishla.gov
St. Mary Parish, LA U.S. rank 16 |
25 of 30 checks pass | B |
| 16 |
lafayettela.gov
Lafayette Parish, LA U.S. rank 17 |
28 of 34 checks pass | B |
| 17 |
bienvilleparish.org
Bienville Parish, LA U.S. rank 18 |
18 of 22 checks pass | B |
| 18 |
rrppj.org
Red River Parish, LA U.S. rank 19 |
21 of 26 checks pass | B |
| 18 |
uppj.org
Union Parish, LA U.S. rank 19 |
16 of 20 checks pass | B |
| 19 |
allenparishpolicejury.com
Allen Parish, LA U.S. rank 23 |
16 of 21 checks pass | C |
| 20 |
stlandrypg.org
St. Landry Parish, LA U.S. rank 24 |
22 of 29 checks pass | C |
| 21 |
beauparish.org
Beauregard Parish, LA U.S. rank 28 |
10 of 14 checks pass | C |
| 22 |
websterparishla.org
Webster Parish, LA U.S. rank 35 |
9 of 14 checks pass | D |
| 23 |
vppj.org
Vermilion Parish, LA U.S. rank 37 |
10 of 16 checks pass | D |
|
appj.org
Acadia Parish, LA |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
calcasieu.gov
Calcasieu Parish, LA |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
evangelineparishpolicejury.com
Evangeline Parish, LA |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
livingstonparishla.gov
Livingston Parish, LA |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
sthelenaparish.la.gov
Saint Helena Parish, LA |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
stcharlesparish.gov
St. Charles Parish, LA |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
tangipahoa.org
Tangipahoa Parish, LA |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
winnparishpolicejury.com
Winn Parish, LA |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 503 | - |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Louisiana. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/6/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 8 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.