Showing Florida county sites. All U.S. county sites
A 90
Average accessibility score of 52 fully scanned Florida county sites
6th
of 49 states, ranked by average accessibility score
52 of 64
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 12, so they're listed without grades
B 88
U.S. county average accessibility score, 2467 fully scanned sites
Florida's state site, myflorida.gov, ranks 10th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.
How Florida county accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 52 fully scanned Florida county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 52 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Florida average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 2 |
| 80 to 89 | 26 |
| 90 to 100 | 24 |
Florida counties by accessibility grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
- No site on our list
1 of the 64 sites on our list could not be matched to a county boundary and appear only in the table.
Florida counties by accessibility grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Florida: 52 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | 46% (24) | 54% (28) | 0% (0) |
| All U.S. counties | 49% (1,201) | 49% (1,197) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Florida county sites by accessibility score
#1 in Florida · U.S. rank 1
Flagler County, FL
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability -
#2 in Florida · U.S. rank 2
Collier County, FL
A 97 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability -
#2 in Florida · U.S. rank 2
Hernando County, FL
A 97 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
What each check means
- Links have a discernible name. Links have unique, descriptive text so users know where they go. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio. Text and background colors meet minimum contrast ratios. Users with low vision cannot read your text.
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order. Page headings follow a logical order without skipping levels. Keyboard users cannot efficiently navigate your site.
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. Buttons and interactive elements are large enough to tap easily on touch screens. Users with motor disabilities struggle to tap small buttons.
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names. A button or link's visible label matches what screen readers announce. Voice control users cannot activate elements by their visible label.
All Florida county sites by accessibility score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
flaglercounty.gov
Flagler County, FL U.S. rank 1 |
33 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
collier.gov
Collier County, FL U.S. rank 2 |
38 of 39 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
hernandocounty.us
Hernando County, FL U.S. rank 2 |
33 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
martin.fl.us
Martin County, FL U.S. rank 2 |
34 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
pascocountyfl.gov
Pasco County, FL U.S. rank 2 |
34 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
columbiacountyfla.com
Columbia County, FL U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
gulfcounty-fl.gov
Gulf County, FL U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
holmescountyfla.com
Holmes County, FL U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
lafayettecountyfl.org
Lafayette County, FL U.S. rank 3 |
26 of 27 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
miamidade.gov
Miami-Dade County, FL U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
polkfl.gov
Polk County, FL U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
indianriver.gov
Indian River County, FL U.S. rank 5 |
34 of 36 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
osceola.org
Osceola County, FL U.S. rank 5 |
35 of 37 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
pinellas.gov
Pinellas County, FL U.S. rank 5 |
32 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
bradfordcountyfl.gov
Bradford County, FL U.S. rank 6 |
31 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
calhouncountyfl.gov
Calhoun County, FL U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
franklincountyflorida.com
Franklin County, FL U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
jacksoncountyfl.gov
Jackson County, FL U.S. rank 6 |
27 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
mymanatee.org
Manatee County, FL U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
putnam-fl.gov
Putnam County, FL U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
taylorcountygov.com
Taylor County, FL U.S. rank 6 |
31 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
libertycountyfl.org
Liberty County, FL U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
nassaucountyfl.com
Nassau County, FL U.S. rank 7 |
35 of 38 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
jeffersoncountyfl.gov
Jefferson County, FL U.S. rank 9 |
28 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 8 |
baycountyfl.gov
Bay County, FL U.S. rank 10 |
33 of 37 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
desotobocc.com
DeSoto County, FL U.S. rank 10 |
35 of 39 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
hamiltoncountyfl.com
Hamilton County, FL U.S. rank 10 |
25 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
cms.leoncountyfl.gov
Leon County, FL U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
santarosa.fl.gov
Santa Rosa County, FL U.S. rank 10 |
33 of 37 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
hendryfla.net
Hendry County, FL U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
discover.pbc.gov
Palm Beach County, FL U.S. rank 11 |
30 of 34 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
pbc.gov
Palm Beach County, FL U.S. rank 11 |
30 of 34 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
sjcfl.us
Saint Johns County, FL U.S. rank 11 |
22 of 25 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
suwanneecountyfl.gov
Suwannee County, FL U.S. rank 11 |
23 of 26 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
mywaltonfl.gov
Walton County, FL U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
myescambia.com
Escambia County, FL U.S. rank 12 |
28 of 32 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
highlandsfl.gov
Highlands County, FL U.S. rank 12 |
29 of 33 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
lakecountyfl.gov
Lake County, FL U.S. rank 12 |
34 of 39 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
myokaloosa.com
Okaloosa County, FL U.S. rank 12 |
27 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
sumtercountyfl.gov
Sumter County, FL U.S. rank 12 |
28 of 32 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
levycounty.org
Levy County, FL U.S. rank 13 |
33 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
gilchrist.fl.us
Gilchrist County, FL U.S. rank 14 |
24 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 13 |
alachuacounty.us
Alachua County, FL U.S. rank 15 |
27 of 32 checks pass | B |
| 13 |
orangecountyfl.net
Orange County, FL U.S. rank 15 |
28 of 33 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
dixiecounty.us
Dixie County, FL U.S. rank 16 |
26 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
mywakulla.com
Wakulla County, FL U.S. rank 16 |
30 of 36 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
citruscounty.gov
Citrus County, FL U.S. rank 17 |
28 of 34 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
madisoncountyfl.com
Madison County, FL U.S. rank 17 |
23 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 16 |
hardeecountyfl.gov
Hardee County, FL U.S. rank 18 |
22 of 27 checks pass | B |
| 17 |
volusia.org
Volusia County, FL U.S. rank 19 |
29 of 36 checks pass | B |
| 18 |
charlottecountyfl.gov
Charlotte County, FL U.S. rank 21 |
26 of 33 checks pass | C |
| 19 |
monroecounty-fl.gov
Monroe County, FL U.S. rank 24 |
25 of 33 checks pass | C |
|
bakercountyfl.org
Baker County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
brevardfl.gov
Brevard County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
broward.org
Broward County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
claycountygov.com
Clay County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
gadsdencountyfl.gov
Gadsden County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
myglades.com
Glades County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
marionfl.org
Marion County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
okeechobeecountyfl.gov
Okeechobee County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
stlucieco.gov
Saint Lucie County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
scgov.net
Sarasota County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
seminolecountyfl.gov
Seminole County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
unioncounty-fl.gov
Union County, FL |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Florida. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 9/30/2026 and 11/6/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 12 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.