Showing Colorado county sites. All U.S. county sites
B 89
Average accessibility score of 33 fully scanned Colorado county sites
6th
of 48 states, ranked by average accessibility score
33 of 63
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 30, so they're listed without grades
B 88
U.S. county average accessibility score, 2435 fully scanned sites
Colorado's state site, colorado.gov, could not be fully scanned. State rankings.
How Colorado county accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 33 fully scanned Colorado county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 33 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Colorado average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 2 |
| 80 to 89 | 18 |
| 90 to 100 | 13 |
Colorado counties by accessibility grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
- No site on our list
Colorado counties by accessibility grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Colorado: 33 sites. U.S.: 2435 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado | 39% (13) | 61% (20) | 0% (0) |
| All U.S. counties | 45% (1,107) | 52% (1,257) | 3% (71) |
Top 3 Colorado county sites by accessibility score
#1 in Colorado · U.S. rank 1
City and County of Denver, CO
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security C
- Usability B
#1 in Colorado · U.S. rank 1
La Plata County, CO
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security B
- Usability F
#1 in Colorado · U.S. rank 1
Weld County, CO
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
What each check means
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order. Page headings follow a logical order without skipping levels. Keyboard users cannot efficiently navigate your site.
- Links have a discernible name. Links have unique, descriptive text so users know where they go. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children. Interactive groups contain all the child elements they need to work correctly. Screen readers cannot navigate grouped elements like menus or lists.
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents. Interactive elements are not hidden from screen reader users. Keyboard users can focus elements that screen readers cannot announce.
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio. Text and background colors meet minimum contrast ratios. Users with low vision cannot read your text.
All Colorado county sites by accessibility score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
denvergov.org
City and County of Denver, CO U.S. rank 1 |
38 of 38 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
lpcgov.org
La Plata County, CO U.S. rank 1 |
34 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
weld.gov
Weld County, CO U.S. rank 1 |
35 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
adamscountyco.gov
Adams County, CO U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
mesacounty.us
Mesa County, CO U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
bacacountyco.gov
Baca County, CO U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
garfieldcountyco.gov
Garfield County, CO U.S. rank 7 |
35 of 38 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
rbc.us
Rio Blanco County, CO U.S. rank 8 |
32 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
sanmiguelcountyco.gov
San Miguel County, CO U.S. rank 8 |
34 of 37 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
tellercounty.gov
Teller County, CO U.S. rank 8 |
34 of 37 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
archuletacounty.gov
Archuleta County, CO U.S. rank 9 |
28 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
bouldercounty.gov
Boulder County, CO U.S. rank 9 |
30 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
jeffco.us
Jefferson County, CO U.S. rank 9 |
29 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
broomfield.org
Broomfield, CO U.S. rank 10 |
34 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 6 |
elbertcounty-co.gov
Elbert County, CO U.S. rank 10 |
33 of 37 checks pass | B |
| 6 |
fremontcountyco.gov
Fremont County, CO U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 6 |
lakecountyco.gov
Lake County, CO U.S. rank 10 |
33 of 37 checks pass | B |
| 6 |
ouraycountyco.gov
Ouray County, CO U.S. rank 10 |
34 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
deltacountyco.gov
Delta County, CO U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
elpasoco.com
El Paso County, CO U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
co.grand.co.us
Grand County, CO U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
parkcountyco.gov
Park County, CO U.S. rank 11 |
32 of 36 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
clearcreekcounty.us
Clear Creek County, CO U.S. rank 13 |
32 of 37 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
gunnisoncounty.org
Gunnison County, CO U.S. rank 13 |
32 of 37 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
co.routt.co.us
Routt County, CO U.S. rank 13 |
33 of 38 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
prowersco.gov
Prowers County, CO U.S. rank 15 |
28 of 33 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
alamosacounty.org
Alamosa County, CO U.S. rank 16 |
30 of 36 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
pitkincounty.com
Pitkin County, CO U.S. rank 16 |
26 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
county.pueblo.org
Pueblo County, CO U.S. rank 16 |
26 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
co.cheyenne.co.us
Cheyenne County, CO U.S. rank 17 |
19 of 23 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
summitcountyco.gov
Summit County, CO U.S. rank 19 |
25 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 13 |
huerfano.us
Huerfano County, CO U.S. rank 21 |
26 of 33 checks pass | C |
| 14 |
custercounty-co.gov
Custer County, CO U.S. rank 24 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
|
arapahoeco.gov
Arapahoe County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
bentcounty.net
Bent County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - | |
|
chaffeecounty.org
Chaffee County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
conejoscounty.colorado.gov
Conejos County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
costillacounty.gov
Costilla County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
crowleycounty.colorado.gov
Crowley County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
dolocnty.colorado.gov
Dolores County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
douglas.co.us
Douglas County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 | - | |
|
eaglecounty.us
Eagle County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
gilpincounty.colorado.gov
Gilpin County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
hinsdalecounty.colorado.gov
Hinsdale County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
jacksoncounty.colorado.gov
Jackson County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
kiowacounty.colorado.gov
Kiowa County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
kitcarsoncounty.colorado.gov
Kit Carson County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
larimer.gov
Larimer County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
lasanimascounty.colorado.gov
Las Animas County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
lincolncounty.colorado.gov
Lincoln County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
logancounty.colorado.gov
Logan County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
mineralcountycolorado.com
Mineral County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
moffatcounty.colorado.gov
Moffat County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
montezumacounty.org
Montezuma County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
morgancounty.colorado.gov
Morgan County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
oterocounty.colorado.gov
Otero County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
phillipscounty.colorado.gov
Phillips County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
riograndecounty.colorado.gov
Rio Grande County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
saguachecounty.colorado.gov
Saguache County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
sanjuancounty.colorado.gov
San Juan County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
sedgwickcounty.colorado.gov
Sedgwick County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
washingtoncounty.colorado.gov
Washington County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
yumacounty.net
Yuma County, CO |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 404 | - |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county government site on our county list in Colorado. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 7/18/2026 and 9/18/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 30 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.