Showing The University of Texas System sites. All education sites
Campuses of the The University of Texas System. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.
B 81
Average botability score of 13 fully scanned The University of Texas System campus sites
16th
of 57 systems, ranked by average botability score
13 of 13
The university of texas system campus sites fully scanned
B 89
Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How The University of Texas System botability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 13 fully scanned The University of Texas System campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 13 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- The University of Texas System average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 3 |
| 70 to 79 | 3 |
| 80 to 89 | 1 |
| 90 to 100 | 6 |
The University of Texas System by botability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. The University of Texas System: 13 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| The University of Texas System | 46% (6) | 31% (4) | 23% (3) |
| All education sites | 71% (1,899) | 25% (660) | 5% (128) |
Top 3 The University of Texas System campus sites by botability score
#1 in The University of Texas System · U.S. education rank 1
The University of Texas at Dallas
A 100 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
#2 in The University of Texas System · U.S. education rank 2
Stephen F Austin State University
A 90 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability F
- Readability A
#2 in The University of Texas System · U.S. education rank 2
The University of Texas at Austin
A 90 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability F
- Readability A
What each check means
- Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
- Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
- Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
- Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
- Content available in document. The page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript. Bots cannot read your content.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites with sitemap problems: 1,031 of 2,650 fully scanned education sites (39%), with every site listed.
- Education websites with robots.txt problems: 95 of 2,629 fully scanned education sites (4%), with every site listed.
- Education websites that need JavaScript to show their content: 68 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (3%), with every site listed.
The University of Texas System campuses by botability score
13 sites, 13 fully scanned, average botability score 81 (B). Part of the headline average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
utdallas.edu
The University of Texas at Dallas U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
sfasu.edu
Stephen F Austin State University U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
uthscsa.edu
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
utpb.edu
The University of Texas Permian Basin U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
utsouthwestern.edu
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
uttyler.edu
The University of Texas at Tyler U.S. rank 7 |
9 of 11 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
utep.edu
The University of Texas at El Paso U.S. rank 9 |
7 of 9 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
uth.edu
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston U.S. rank 9 |
7 of 9 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio U.S. rank 11 |
8 of 11 checks pass | C |
| 6 |
utmb.edu
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston U.S. rank 14 |
6 of 9 checks pass | D |
| 7 |
uta.edu
The University of Texas at Arlington U.S. rank 15 |
7 of 11 checks pass | D |
| 7 |
utrgv.edu
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley U.S. rank 15 |
7 of 11 checks pass | D |
System office by botability score
1 sites, 1 fully scanned. Not part of the average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
utsystem.edu
The University of Texas System Office U.S. rank 15 |
7 of 11 checks pass | D |
About botability
Help AI and search engines discover, crawl, and index your website.
Why it's important
Smart technology can better process and share public information, making services faster and more efficient for users.
Risks
- AI tools cannot find or understand your content.
Guidance
What we use to grade botability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- The Web Robots Pages
- Schema.org
- sitemaps.org
- Google Search Central
Standards
- Crawlable
- Content available in document
- GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type
- Sitemap status
- Sitemap XML
- Robots valid
- Robots allowed
- Sitemap in robots.txt
- Canonical
- Link text
- hreflang
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.