The University of Texas System: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 14 The University of Texas System campus websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 14
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Campuses of the The University of Texas System. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.

B 81

Average botability score of 13 fully scanned The University of Texas System campus sites

16th

of 57 systems, ranked by average botability score

13 of 13

The university of texas system campus sites fully scanned

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How The University of Texas System botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 13 fully scanned The University of Texas System campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 13 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • The University of Texas System average
  • All education average
View the data table
How The University of Texas System botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 693
70 to 793
80 to 891
90 to 1006

The University of Texas System by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. The University of Texas System: 13 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. The University of Texas SystemA (90 to 100): 46% (6 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 31% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 23% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
The University of Texas System by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
The University of Texas System46% (6)31% (4)23% (3)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 The University of Texas System campus sites by botability score

#1 in The University of Texas System · U.S. education rank 1

The University of Texas at Dallas

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in The University of Texas System · U.S. education rank 2

Stephen F Austin State University

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#2 in The University of Texas System · U.S. education rank 2

The University of Texas at Austin

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among The University of Texas System campus sites

Share of the 13 fully scanned The University of Texas System campus sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Sitemap in robots.txt46% (6 of 13 sites)
  2. Sitemap status46% (6 of 13 sites)
  3. Sitemap XML46% (6 of 13 sites)
  4. Link text46% (6 of 13 sites)
  5. Content available in document8% (1 of 13 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among The University of Texas System campus sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Sitemap in robots.txt46%6
Sitemap status46%6
Sitemap XML46%6
Link text46%6
Content available in document8%1

What each check means

  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Content available in document. The page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript. Bots cannot read your content.

Every education site with one problem

The University of Texas System campuses by botability score

13 sites, 13 fully scanned, average botability score 81 (B). Part of the headline average.

The University of Texas System campuses ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 utdallas.edu
The University of Texas at Dallas U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 sfasu.edu
Stephen F Austin State University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 uthscsa.edu
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 utpb.edu
The University of Texas Permian Basin U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 utsouthwestern.edu
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 uttyler.edu
The University of Texas at Tyler U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 utep.edu
The University of Texas at El Paso U.S. rank 9
7 of 9 checks pass C
4 uth.edu
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston U.S. rank 9
7 of 9 checks pass C
5 utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
6 utmb.edu
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston U.S. rank 14
6 of 9 checks pass D
7 uta.edu
The University of Texas at Arlington U.S. rank 15
7 of 11 checks pass D
7 utrgv.edu
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley U.S. rank 15
7 of 11 checks pass D

System office by botability score

1 sites, 1 fully scanned. Not part of the average.

System office ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 utsystem.edu
The University of Texas System Office U.S. rank 15
7 of 11 checks pass D

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo