Texas A&M University System: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Texas A&M University System campus websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Campuses of the Texas A&M University System. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.

A 90

Average botability score of 9 fully scanned Texas A&M University System campus sites

8th

of 57 systems, ranked by average botability score

9 of 10

Texas a&m university system campus sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Texas A&M University System botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Texas A&M University System campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Texas A&M University System average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Texas A&M University System botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1006

Texas A&M University System by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Texas A&M University System: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Texas A&M University SystemA (90 to 100): 67% (6 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 33% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Texas A&M University System by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Texas A&M University System67% (6)33% (3)0% (0)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Texas A&M University System campus sites by botability score

#1 in Texas A&M University System · U.S. education rank 1

Texas A&M University-College Station

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#1 in Texas A&M University System · U.S. education rank 1

Texas A&M University-San Antonio

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#2 in Texas A&M University System · U.S. education rank 2

Tarleton State University

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability F

Most common botability failures among Texas A&M University System campus sites

Share of the 9 fully scanned Texas A&M University System campus sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Link text44% (4 of 9 sites)
  2. Sitemap in robots.txt22% (2 of 9 sites)
  3. Sitemap status11% (1 of 9 sites)
  4. Sitemap XML11% (1 of 9 sites)
  5. Content available in document11% (1 of 9 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Texas A&M University System campus sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Link text44%4
Sitemap in robots.txt22%2
Sitemap status11%1
Sitemap XML11%1
Content available in document11%1

What each check means

  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Content available in document. The page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript. Bots cannot read your content.

Every education site with one problem

Texas A&M University System campuses by botability score

10 sites, 9 fully scanned, average botability score 90 (A). Part of the headline average.

Texas A&M University System campuses ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 tamu.edu
Texas A&M University-College Station U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 tamusa.edu
Texas A&M University-San Antonio U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 tarleton.edu
Tarleton State University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 tamucc.edu
Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 tamuk.edu
Texas A&M University-Kingsville U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 tamut.edu
Texas A&M University-Texarkana U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 tamuct.edu
Texas A&M University-Central Texas U.S. rank 3
8 of 9 checks pass B
3 wtamu.edu
West Texas A & M University U.S. rank 3
8 of 9 checks pass B
4 tamiu.edu
Texas A & M International University U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
pvamu.edu
Prairie View A & M University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 -

System office by botability score

1 sites, 1 fully scanned. Not part of the average.

System office ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 tamus.edu
Texas A & M University-System Office U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo