Showing Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning sites. All education sites
Campuses of the Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.
F 58
Average usability score of 7 fully scanned Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning campus sites
19th
of 57 systems, ranked by average usability score
7 of 8
Mississippi institutions of higher learning campus sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 7 fully scanned Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 7 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 | 1 |
| 50 to 59 | 2 |
| 60 to 69 | 1 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 2 |
| 90 to 100 | 0 |
Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning: 7 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning | 0% (0) | 29% (2) | 71% (5) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning campus sites by usability score
#1 in Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning · U.S. education rank 10
Alcorn State University
B 80 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability F
#1 in Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning · U.S. education rank 10
Mississippi State University
B 80 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
#2 in Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning · U.S. education rank 18
Jackson State University
D 66 usability
- Accessibility B
- Botability B
- Security C
- Usability D
- Readability A
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning campuses by usability score
8 sites, 7 fully scanned, average usability score 58 (F). Part of the headline average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
alcorn.edu
Alcorn State University U.S. rank 10 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 1 |
msstate.edu
Mississippi State University U.S. rank 10 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
jsums.edu
Jackson State University U.S. rank 18 |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 3 |
olemiss.edu
University of Mississippi U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
mvsu.edu
Mississippi Valley State University U.S. rank 25 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
usm.edu
University of Southern Mississippi U.S. rank 29 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
muw.edu
Mississippi University for Women U.S. rank 33 |
5 of 15 checks pass | F |
|
deltastate.edu
Delta State University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - |
System office by usability score
1 sites, 1 fully scanned. Not part of the average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
mississippi.edu
Board of Trustees-Mississippi State Institutions of Higher Learning U.S. rank 29 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.