Showing Kentucky Community and Technical College System sites. All education sites
Campuses of the Kentucky Community and Technical College System. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.
B 81
Average usability score of 16 fully scanned Kentucky Community and Technical College System campus sites
3rd
of 57 systems, ranked by average usability score
16 of 16
Kentucky community and technical college system campus sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Kentucky Community and Technical College System usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 16 fully scanned Kentucky Community and Technical College System campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 16 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Kentucky Community and Technical College System average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 7 |
| 80 to 89 | 8 |
| 90 to 100 | 1 |
Kentucky Community and Technical College System by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Kentucky Community and Technical College System: 16 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky Community and Technical College System | 6% (1) | 94% (15) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Kentucky Community and Technical College System campus sites by usability score
#1 in Kentucky Community and Technical College System · U.S. education rank 2
Big Sandy Community and Technical College
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability A
#2 in Kentucky Community and Technical College System · U.S. education rank 4
Ashland Community and Technical College
B 87 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
#2 in Kentucky Community and Technical College System · U.S. education rank 4
Hopkinsville Community College
B 87 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP). The page responds to user interactions in under 0.2 seconds. Site feels frozen when users click things.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Kentucky Community and Technical College System campuses by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
bigsandy.kctcs.edu
Big Sandy Community and Technical College U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
ashland.kctcs.edu
Ashland Community and Technical College U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
hopkinsville.kctcs.edu
Hopkinsville Community College U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
somerset.kctcs.edu
Somerset Community College U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
southeast.kctcs.edu
Southeast Kentucky Community & Technical College U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
westkentucky.kctcs.edu
West Kentucky Community and Technical College U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
bluegrass.kctcs.edu
Bluegrass Community and Technical College U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
elizabethtown.kctcs.edu
Elizabethtown Community and Technical College U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
jefferson.kctcs.edu
Jefferson Community and Technical College U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
gateway.kctcs.edu
Gateway Community and Technical College U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
hazard.kctcs.edu
Hazard Community and Technical College U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
henderson.kctcs.edu
Henderson Community College U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
madisonville.kctcs.edu
Madisonville Community College U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
maysville.kctcs.edu
Maysville Community and Technical College U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
owensboro.kctcs.edu
Owensboro Community and Technical College U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
southcentral.kctcs.edu
Southcentral Kentucky Community and Technical College U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.