Illinois Community College System: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Illinois Community College System campus websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Campuses of the Illinois Community College System. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.

B 86

Average botability score of 10 fully scanned Illinois Community College System campus sites

12th

of 57 systems, ranked by average botability score

10 of 12

Illinois community college system campus sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Illinois Community College System botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Illinois Community College System campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Illinois Community College System average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Illinois Community College System botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 791
80 to 891
90 to 1006

Illinois Community College System by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Illinois Community College System: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Illinois Community College SystemA (90 to 100): 60% (6 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 20% (2 sites)D to F (below 70): 20% (2 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Illinois Community College System by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Illinois Community College System60% (6)20% (2)20% (2)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Illinois Community College System campus sites by botability score

#1 in Illinois Community College System · U.S. education rank 1

Carl Sandburg College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Illinois Community College System · U.S. education rank 1

John A Logan College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Illinois Community College System · U.S. education rank 1

Lewis and Clark Community College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common botability failures among Illinois Community College System campus sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned Illinois Community College System campus sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Link text50% (5 of 10 sites)
  2. Sitemap in robots.txt40% (4 of 10 sites)
  3. Sitemap status20% (2 of 10 sites)
  4. Sitemap XML20% (2 of 10 sites)
  5. Canonical10% (1 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Illinois Community College System campus sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Link text50%5
Sitemap in robots.txt40%4
Sitemap status20%2
Sitemap XML20%2
Canonical10%1

What each check means

  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Canonical. Each page declares a preferred URL so search engines show the right link. Search rankings split across duplicate pages.

Every education site with one problem

Illinois Community College System campuses by botability score

Illinois Community College System campuses ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 sandburg.edu
Carl Sandburg College U.S. rank 1
9 of 9 checks pass A
1 jalc.edu
John A Logan College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 lc.edu
Lewis and Clark Community College U.S. rank 1
9 of 9 checks pass A
1 morainevalley.edu
Moraine Valley Community College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 jwcc.edu
John Wood Community College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 triton.edu
Triton College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 rlc.edu
Rend Lake College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 jjc.edu
Joliet Junior College U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
5 kaskaskia.edu
Kaskaskia College U.S. rank 14
6 of 9 checks pass D
6 iecc.edu
Illinois Eastern Community Colleges U.S. rank 15
7 of 11 checks pass D
icc.edu
Illinois Central College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
sic.edu
Southeastern Illinois College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo