Showing Texas research university sites. All education sites
R1 and R2 universities in Texas, public and private together.
B 86
Average botability score of 21 fully scanned Texas research university sites
9th
of 17 states, ranked by average botability score
21 of 22
Texas research university sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades
B 89
Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Texas botability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 21 fully scanned Texas research university sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 21 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Texas average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 4 |
| 70 to 79 | 3 |
| 80 to 89 | 1 |
| 90 to 100 | 13 |
Texas research universities by botability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Texas research universities: 21 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 62% (13) | 19% (4) | 19% (4) |
| All education sites | 71% (1,899) | 25% (660) | 5% (128) |
Top 3 Texas research university sites by botability score
#1 in Texas · U.S. education rank 1
Rice University
A 100 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
#1 in Texas · U.S. education rank 1
Southern Methodist University
A 100 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability F
#1 in Texas · U.S. education rank 1
Texas A&M University-College Station
A 100 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability D
- Readability A
What each check means
- Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
- Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
- Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
- Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
- Content available in document. The page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript. Bots cannot read your content.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites with sitemap problems: 1,031 of 2,650 fully scanned education sites (39%), with every site listed.
- Education websites with robots.txt problems: 95 of 2,629 fully scanned education sites (4%), with every site listed.
- Education websites that need JavaScript to show their content: 68 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (3%), with every site listed.
Research universities in Texas by botability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
rice.edu
Rice University U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
smu.edu
Southern Methodist University U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
tamu.edu
Texas A&M University-College Station U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
tcu.edu
Texas Christian University U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
tsu.edu
Texas Southern University U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
utdallas.edu
The University of Texas at Dallas U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
uh.edu
University of Houston U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
unt.edu
University of North Texas U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
shsu.edu
Sam Houston State University U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
tarleton.edu
Tarleton State University U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
tamucc.edu
Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
tamuk.edu
Texas A&M University-Kingsville U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
utexas.edu
The University of Texas at Austin U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
uttyler.edu
The University of Texas at Tyler U.S. rank 7 |
9 of 11 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
utep.edu
The University of Texas at El Paso U.S. rank 9 |
7 of 9 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
baylor.edu
Baylor University U.S. rank 11 |
8 of 11 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio U.S. rank 11 |
8 of 11 checks pass | C |
| 6 |
txst.edu
Texas State University U.S. rank 14 |
6 of 9 checks pass | D |
| 6 |
ttu.edu
Texas Tech University U.S. rank 14 |
6 of 9 checks pass | D |
| 7 |
uta.edu
The University of Texas at Arlington U.S. rank 15 |
7 of 11 checks pass | D |
| 7 |
utrgv.edu
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley U.S. rank 15 |
7 of 11 checks pass | D |
|
pvamu.edu
Prairie View A & M University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 | - |
About botability
Help AI and search engines discover, crawl, and index your website.
Why it's important
Smart technology can better process and share public information, making services faster and more efficient for users.
Risks
- AI tools cannot find or understand your content.
Guidance
What we use to grade botability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- The Web Robots Pages
- Schema.org
- sitemaps.org
- Google Search Central
Standards
- Crawlable
- Content available in document
- GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type
- Sitemap status
- Sitemap XML
- Robots valid
- Robots allowed
- Sitemap in robots.txt
- Canonical
- Link text
- hreflang
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.