Colorado research universities: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 5 Colorado research university websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 5
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing Colorado research university sites. All education sites

R1 and R2 universities in Colorado, public and private together.

C 73

Average usability score of 5 fully scanned Colorado research university sites

3rd

of 17 states, ranked by average usability score

5 of 5

Colorado research university sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Colorado usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 5 fully scanned Colorado research university sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • Colorado average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 792
80 to 891
90 to 1000

Colorado research universities by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Colorado research universities: 5 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Colorado
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Colorado0% (0)60% (3)40% (2)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Colorado research university sites by usability score

#1 in Colorado · U.S. education rank 10

Colorado School of Mines

B 80 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in Colorado · U.S. education rank 11

Colorado State University-Fort Collins

C 78 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#3 in Colorado · U.S. education rank 14

University of Colorado Colorado Springs

C 73 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Colorado research university sites

Share of the 5 fully scanned Colorado research university sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. First Contentful Paint (FCP)80%
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)80%
  3. Open Graph image alt80%
  4. Open Graph site name40%
  5. Open Graph type40%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
First Contentful Paint (FCP)80%4
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)80%4
Open Graph image alt80%4
Open Graph site name40%2
Open Graph type40%2

What each check means

  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.

Every education site with one problem

Research universities in Colorado by usability score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 mines.edu
Colorado School of Mines U.S. rank 10 		12 of 15 checks pass B
2 colostate.edu
Colorado State University-Fort Collins U.S. rank 11 		11 of 14 checks pass C
3 uccs.edu
University of Colorado Colorado Springs U.S. rank 14 		11 of 15 checks pass C
4 du.edu
University of Denver U.S. rank 17 		11 of 16 checks pass D
5 colorado.edu
University of Colorado Boulder U.S. rank 18 		10 of 15 checks pass D

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo