Presidents' Athletic Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Presidents' Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Presidents' Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 70

Average usability score of 9 fully scanned Presidents' Athletic Conference member sites

12th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

9 of 11

Presidents' athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Presidents' Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Presidents' Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Presidents' Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Presidents' Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 491
50 to 590
60 to 691
70 to 792
80 to 894
90 to 1000

Presidents' Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Presidents' Athletic Conference: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Presidents' Athletic ConferenceB to C (70 to 89): 67% (6 sites)D to F (below 70): 33% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Presidents' Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Presidents' Athletic Conference0% (0)67% (6)33% (3)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Presidents' Athletic Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Presidents' Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Chatham University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Presidents' Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Thiel College

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility C
  • Botability C
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in Presidents' Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Geneva College

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Presidents' Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 9 fully scanned Presidents' Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt100% (9 of 9 sites)
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)56% (5 of 9 sites)
  3. Open Graph site name56% (5 of 9 sites)
  4. Time to First Byte (TTFB)33% (3 of 9 sites)
  5. Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)33% (3 of 9 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Presidents' Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt100%9
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)56%5
Open Graph site name56%5
Time to First Byte (TTFB)33%3
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)33%3

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.
  • Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). Page content stays in place as the page loads. Users click wrong buttons by mistake.

Every education site with one problem

Presidents' Athletic Conference members by usability score

Presidents' Athletic Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 chatham.edu
Chatham University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
1 thiel.edu
Thiel College U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 geneva.edu
Geneva College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 westminster.edu
Westminster College U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
4 stvincent.edu
Saint Vincent College U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
4 waynesburg.edu
Waynesburg University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
5 franciscan.edu
Franciscan University of Steubenville U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
6 francis.edu
Saint Francis University U.S. rank 27
7 of 16 checks pass F
7 gcc.edu
Grove City College U.S. rank 31
6 of 16 checks pass F
bethanywv.edu
Bethany College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
hiram.edu
Hiram College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo