Peach Belt Conference websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 10 Peach Belt Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 10
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing Peach Belt Conference member sites. All education sites

Members of the Peach Belt Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 73

Average usability score of 9 fully scanned Peach Belt Conference member sites

9th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

9 of 10

Peach belt conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Peach Belt Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Peach Belt Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • Peach Belt Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 593
60 to 691
70 to 792
80 to 891
90 to 1002

Peach Belt Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Peach Belt Conference: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Peach Belt Conference
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Peach Belt Conference22% (2)33% (3)44% (4)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Peach Belt Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Peach Belt Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Lander University

A 100 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Peach Belt Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Flagler College

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#3 in Peach Belt Conference · U.S. education rank 10

Columbus State University

B 80 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Peach Belt Conference member sites

Share of the 9 fully scanned Peach Belt Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph site name78%
  2. Open Graph image alt67%
  3. First Contentful Paint (FCP)44%
  4. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)44%
  5. Open Graph description44%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph site name78%7
Open Graph image alt67%6
First Contentful Paint (FCP)44%4
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)44%4
Open Graph description44%4

What each check means

  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.

Every education site with one problem

Peach Belt Conference members by usability score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 lander.edu
Lander University U.S. rank 1 		16 of 16 checks pass A
2 flagler.edu
Flagler College U.S. rank 2 		15 of 16 checks pass A
3 columbusstate.edu
Columbus State University U.S. rank 10 		12 of 15 checks pass B
4 augusta.edu
Augusta University U.S. rank 14 		11 of 15 checks pass C
4 gsw.edu
Georgia Southwestern State University U.S. rank 14 		11 of 15 checks pass C
5 uscb.edu
University of South Carolina Beaufort U.S. rank 18 		10 of 15 checks pass D
6 clayton.edu
Clayton State University U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F
6 ung.edu
University of North Georgia U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F
6 usca.edu
University of South Carolina Aiken U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F
gcsu.edu
Georgia College & State University 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo