Showing Ohio Athletic Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Ohio Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 74
Average usability score of 9 fully scanned Ohio Athletic Conference member sites
8th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
9 of 9
Ohio athletic conference member sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Ohio Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Ohio Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Ohio Athletic Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 3 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 4 |
| 90 to 100 | 1 |
Ohio Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Ohio Athletic Conference: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio Athletic Conference | 11% (1) | 56% (5) | 33% (3) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Ohio Athletic Conference member sites by usability score
#1 in Ohio Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 2
Capital University
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability A
#2 in Ohio Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 4
Wilmington College
B 87 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability F
#3 in Ohio Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9
Marietta College
B 81 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.
- Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Ohio Athletic Conference members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
capital.edu
Capital University U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
wilmington.edu
Wilmington College U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
marietta.edu
Marietta College U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
muskingum.edu
Muskingum University U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
otterbein.edu
Otterbein University U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
bw.edu
Baldwin Wallace University U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
heidelberg.edu
Heidelberg University U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
onu.edu
Ohio Northern University U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
mountunion.edu
University of Mount Union U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.