Showing Northwest Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Northwest Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
B 87
Average security score of 9 fully scanned Northwest Conference member sites
7th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score
9 of 9
Northwest conference member sites fully scanned
B 85
Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Northwest Conference security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Northwest Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Northwest Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 7 |
| 90 to 100 | 1 |
Northwest Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Northwest Conference: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northwest Conference | 11% (1) | 89% (8) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 19% (505) | 79% (2,113) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Northwest Conference member sites by security score
#1 in Northwest Conference · U.S. education rank 1
George Fox University
A 100 security
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability A
#2 in Northwest Conference · U.S. education rank 3
Lewis & Clark College
B 87 security
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
#2 in Northwest Conference · U.S. education rank 3
Linfield University
B 87 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability C
- Security B
- Usability D
- Readability A
What each check means
- X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
Northwest Conference members by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
georgefox.edu
George Fox University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
lclark.edu
Lewis & Clark College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
linfield.edu
Linfield University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
plu.edu
Pacific Lutheran University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
pacificu.edu
Pacific University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
whitman.edu
Whitman College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
whitworth.edu
Whitworth University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
willamette.edu
Willamette University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
pugetsound.edu
University of Puget Sound U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.