Northwest Conference websites: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 9 Northwest Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Northwest Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

F 44

Average readability score of 9 fully scanned Northwest Conference member sites

24th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score

9 of 9

Northwest conference member sites fully scanned

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Northwest Conference readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Northwest Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Northwest Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Northwest Conference readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 95
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1004

Northwest Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Northwest Conference: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Northwest ConferenceA (90 to 100): 44% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 56% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Northwest Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Northwest Conference44% (4)0% (0)56% (5)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 Northwest Conference member sites by readability score

#1 in Northwest Conference · U.S. education rank 1

George Fox University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Northwest Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Linfield University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability C
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#1 in Northwest Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Pacific Lutheran University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

Most common readability failures among Northwest Conference member sites

Share of the 9 fully scanned Northwest Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level56% (5 of 9 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among Northwest Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level56%5

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

Northwest Conference members by readability score

Northwest Conference members ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 georgefox.edu
George Fox University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 linfield.edu
Linfield University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 plu.edu
Pacific Lutheran University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 whitworth.edu
Whitworth University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
2 lclark.edu
Lewis & Clark College U.S. rank 74
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 pacificu.edu
Pacific University U.S. rank 150
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 pugetsound.edu
University of Puget Sound U.S. rank 198
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 whitman.edu
Whitman College U.S. rank 48
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 willamette.edu
Willamette University U.S. rank 74
0 of 1 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo