New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 11 New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 86

Average botability score of 11 fully scanned New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference member sites

12th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

11 of 11

New england women's and men's athletic conference member sites fully scanned

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 11 fully scanned New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 11 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 691
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1007

New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference: 11 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. New England Women's and Men's Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 64% (7 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 27% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 9% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference64% (7)27% (3)9% (1)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference member sites by botability score

#1 in New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Clark University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Mount Holyoke College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Emerson College

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 11 fully scanned New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Sitemap in robots.txt45% (5 of 11 sites)
  2. Link text45% (5 of 11 sites)
  3. Sitemap status18% (2 of 11 sites)
  4. Sitemap XML18% (2 of 11 sites)
  5. GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type9% (1 of 11 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Sitemap in robots.txt45%5
Link text45%5
Sitemap status18%2
Sitemap XML18%2
GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type9%1

What each check means

  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type. Homepage is marked up as an official government organization. Systems cannot verify you are an official government site.

Every education site with one problem

New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference members by botability score

New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 clarku.edu
Clark University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 mtholyoke.edu
Mount Holyoke College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 emerson.edu
Emerson College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 salve.edu
Salve Regina University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 wellesley.edu
Wellesley College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 wheatoncollege.edu
Wheaton College (Massachusetts) U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 wpi.edu
Worcester Polytechnic Institute U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 smith.edu
Smith College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 uscga.edu
U.S. Coast Guard U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 web.mit.edu
Massachusetts Institute of Technology U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
5 babson.edu
Babson College U.S. rank 14
6 of 9 checks pass D

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/26/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo