Great American Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Great American Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Great American Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 68

Average usability score of 11 fully scanned Great American Conference member sites

14th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

11 of 12

Great american conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Great American Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 11 fully scanned Great American Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 11 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Great American Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Great American Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 492
50 to 592
60 to 691
70 to 791
80 to 894
90 to 1001

Great American Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Great American Conference: 11 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Great American ConferenceA (90 to 100): 9% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 45% (5 sites)D to F (below 70): 45% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Great American Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Great American Conference9% (1)45% (5)45% (5)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Great American Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Great American Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Henderson State University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Great American Conference · U.S. education rank 4

East Central University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Great American Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Ouachita Baptist University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Great American Conference member sites

Share of the 11 fully scanned Great American Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt91% (10 of 11 sites)
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)55% (6 of 11 sites)
  3. Open Graph site name55% (6 of 11 sites)
  4. Open Graph type45% (5 of 11 sites)
  5. Open Graph URL45% (5 of 11 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Great American Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt91%10
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)55%6
Open Graph site name55%6
Open Graph type45%5
Open Graph URL45%5

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
  • Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.

Every education site with one problem

Great American Conference members by usability score

Great American Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 hsu.edu
Henderson State University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 ecok.edu
East Central University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 obu.edu
Ouachita Baptist University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 snu.edu
Southern Nazarene University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
4 saumag.edu
Southern Arkansas University Main Campus U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
5 se.edu
Southeastern Oklahoma State University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
6 okbu.edu
Oklahoma Baptist University U.S. rank 20
10 of 16 checks pass D
7 harding.edu
Harding University U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
8 uamont.edu
University of Arkansas at Monticello U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
9 atu.edu
Arkansas Tech University U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
9 swosu.edu
Southwestern Oklahoma State University U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
nwosu.edu
Northwestern Oklahoma State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo