East Coast Conference websites: security rankings

Security scores, grades, and the most common failures for 7 East Coast Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 7
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the East Coast Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 89

Average security score of 7 fully scanned East Coast Conference member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score

7 of 7

East coast conference member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How East Coast Conference security scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 7 fully scanned East Coast Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 7 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • East Coast Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How East Coast Conference security scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 896
90 to 1001

East Coast Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. East Coast Conference: 7 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. East Coast ConferenceA (90 to 100): 14% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 86% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 19% (505 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 79% (2,113 sites)D to F (below 70): 3% (69 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
East Coast Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
East Coast Conference14% (1)86% (6)0% (0)
All education sites19% (505)79% (2,113)3% (69)

Top 3 East Coast Conference member sites by security score

#1 in East Coast Conference · U.S. education rank 1

College of Staten Island CUNY

A 100 security

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security A
  • Usability F
  • Readability F

#2 in East Coast Conference · U.S. education rank 3

CUNY Queens College

B 87 security

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability C
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#2 in East Coast Conference · U.S. education rank 3

Daemen University

B 87 security

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability -

Most common security failures among East Coast Conference member sites

Share of the 7 fully scanned East Coast Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. X-Content-Type-Options57% (4 of 7 sites)
  2. Errors in the console29% (2 of 7 sites)
View the data table
Most common security failures among East Coast Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
X-Content-Type-Options57%4
Errors in the console29%2

What each check means

  • X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
  • Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.

East Coast Conference members by security score

East Coast Conference members ranked by security score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 csi.cuny.edu
College of Staten Island CUNY U.S. rank 1
8 of 8 checks pass A
2 qc.cuny.edu
CUNY Queens College U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 daemen.edu
Daemen University U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 mercy.edu
Mercy University U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 molloy.edu
Molloy University U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 roberts.edu
Roberts Wesleyan University U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 udc.edu
University of the District of Columbia U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo