East Coast Conference websites: accessibility rankings

Accessibility scores, grades, and the most common failures for 7 East Coast Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 7
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the East Coast Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 93

Average accessibility score of 7 fully scanned East Coast Conference member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average accessibility score

7 of 7

East coast conference member sites fully scanned

A 91

Average accessibility score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How East Coast Conference accessibility scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 7 fully scanned East Coast Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 7 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • East Coast Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How East Coast Conference accessibility scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 891
90 to 1006

East Coast Conference by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. East Coast Conference: 7 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. East Coast ConferenceA (90 to 100): 86% (6 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 14% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 66% (1,765 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 33% (888 sites)D to F (below 70): 1% (34 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
East Coast Conference by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
East Coast Conference86% (6)14% (1)0% (0)
All education sites66% (1,765)33% (888)1% (34)

Top 3 East Coast Conference member sites by accessibility score

#1 in East Coast Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Molloy University

A 100 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#2 in East Coast Conference · U.S. education rank 3

College of Staten Island CUNY

A 96 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security A
  • Usability F
  • Readability F

#2 in East Coast Conference · U.S. education rank 3

Mercy University

A 96 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

Most common accessibility failures among East Coast Conference member sites

Share of the 7 fully scanned East Coast Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio43% (3 of 7 sites)
  2. Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order43% (3 of 7 sites)
  3. Links have a discernible name29% (2 of 7 sites)
  4. [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents14% (1 of 7 sites)
  5. Image elements have [alt] attributes14% (1 of 7 sites)
View the data table

What each check means

East Coast Conference members by accessibility score

East Coast Conference members ranked by accessibility score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 molloy.edu
Molloy University U.S. rank 1
28 of 28 checks pass A
2 csi.cuny.edu
College of Staten Island CUNY U.S. rank 3
32 of 33 checks pass A
2 mercy.edu
Mercy University U.S. rank 3
29 of 30 checks pass A
3 daemen.edu
Daemen University U.S. rank 6
30 of 32 checks pass A
4 udc.edu
University of the District of Columbia U.S. rank 8
32 of 35 checks pass A
5 roberts.edu
Roberts Wesleyan University U.S. rank 9
30 of 33 checks pass A
6 qc.cuny.edu
CUNY Queens College U.S. rank 17
24 of 29 checks pass B

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo