City websites with sitemap problems

67 of 208 fully scanned U.S. city websites have a sitemap problem. The share in each state and every site listed, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 266
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Of the 208 fully scanned U.S. city sites we tested, 67 (32%) have a sitemap problem. Among states with at least 10 tested sites, California has the highest share (27%). Florida has the lowest (9%). A sitemap is an XML file that lists the pages on a site. Search engines and AI agents read it to find pages they would otherwise miss, and robots.txt is where they look for its address. A site fails if it fails any of these checks: Sitemap status, Sitemap XML, and Sitemap in robots.txt.

67 of 208

City sites that have a sitemap problem

32%

Share of tested city sites that fail these checks

29 of 41

States with at least one failing city site

27%

California has the highest share: 8 of 30 tested city sites

By state

The share of tested city sites in each state that have a sitemap problem.

States by share of city sites failing the Sitemap checks
State Tested Sitemap problem Share
Colorado 2 2 100%
Nevada 2 2 100%
Rhode Island 1 1 100%
West Virginia 1 1 100%
Massachusetts 6 5 83%
Missouri 5 4 80%
Oregon 3 2 67%
Alabama 2 1 50%
Idaho 2 1 50%
Indiana 2 1 50%
New Hampshire 2 1 50%
New Jersey 2 1 50%
North Dakota 2 1 50%
Oklahoma 2 1 50%
Pennsylvania 2 1 50%
Wisconsin 2 1 50%
Washington 9 4 44%
Ohio 7 3 43%
Arizona 5 2 40%
Michigan 6 2 33%
North Carolina 6 2 33%
Virginia 6 2 33%
Minnesota 3 1 33%
New Mexico 3 1 33%
South Carolina 3 1 33%
California 30 8 27%
Texas 51 13 25%
Tennessee 5 1 20%
Florida 11 1 9%
Arkansas 1 0 0%
Connecticut 1 0 0%
Georgia 4 0 0%
Illinois 4 0 0%
Kansas 1 0 0%
Louisiana 4 0 0%
Maine 1 0 0%
Maryland 1 0 0%
Montana 3 0 0%
New York 3 0 0%
South Dakota 1 0 0%
Utah 1 0 0%

What is wrong with the sitemap

The 67 city sites that have a sitemap problem, grouped by problem.

  1. Sitemap not listed in robots.txt37
  2. No working sitemap30
View the data table
What is wrong with the sitemap
ProblemSites
Sitemap not listed in robots.txt37
No working sitemap30

The 67 city sites that have a sitemap problem

Sorted by state, then name. Each site links to its botability report and shows its botability and overall grades from the same scan.

City sites have a sitemap problem
Site State Botability Overall
huntsvilleal.gov
City of Huntsville, AL
Alabama B A
chandlerazpd.gov
City of Chandler, AZ
Arizona C C
scottsdaleaz.gov
City of Scottsdale, AZ
Arizona D B
bakersfieldcity.us
City of Bakersfield, CA
California D C
ggcity.org
City of GARDEN GROVE, CA
California B B
longbeach.gov
City of Long Beach, CA
California C C
piedmont.ca.gov
City of Piedmont, CA
California B C
cityofrc.us
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
California B C
sandiego.gov
City of San Diego, CA
California B B
stocktonca.gov
City of Stockton, CA
California F C
toaks.gov
City of Thousand Oaks, CA
California C C
bouldercolorado.gov
City of Boulder, CO
Colorado B B
thorntonco.gov
City of Thornton, CO
Colorado B A
pompanobeachfl.gov
City of Pompano Beach, FL
Florida B B
cityofboise.org
City of Boise, ID
Idaho B C
indy.gov
Marion County, IN
Indiana F C
boston.gov
City of Boston, MA
Massachusetts B B
cambridgema.gov
City of Cambridge, MA
Massachusetts F B
lynnma.gov
City of Lynn, MA
Massachusetts C C
quincyma.gov
City of Quincy, MA
Massachusetts D B
springfield-ma.gov
City of Springfield, MA
Massachusetts F C
dearborn.gov
City of Dearborn, MI
Michigan C C
lansingmi.gov
City of Lansing, MI
Michigan D B
stpaul.gov
City of Saint Paul, MN
Minnesota C B
independencemo.gov
City of Independence, MO
Missouri B B
jeffersoncitymo.gov
City of Jefferson City, MO
Missouri F B
stlouis-mo.gov
City of St. Louis, MO
Missouri D A
cityofnormandy.gov
City of St. Louis, MO
Missouri B C
lasvegasnevada.gov
City of Las Vegas, NV
Nevada C D
reno.gov
City of Reno, NV
Nevada F C
manchesternh.gov
City of Manchester, NH
New Hampshire D C
jerseycitynj.gov
City of Jersey City, NJ
New Jersey C C
cabq.gov
City of Albuquerque, NM
New Mexico C B
kannapolisnc.gov
City of Concord, NC
North Carolina C D
concordnc.gov
City of Concord, NC
North Carolina B C
fargond.gov
City of Fargo, ND
North Dakota D C
akronohio.gov
City of Akron, OH
Ohio D D
cincinnati-oh.gov
City of Cincinnati, OH
Ohio D C
clevelandohio.gov
City of Cleveland, OH
Ohio C B
cityoftulsa.org
City of Tulsa, OK
Oklahoma F D
greshamoregon.gov
City of Gresham, OR
Oregon D B
portland.gov
City of Portland, OR
Oregon F B
harrisburgpa.gov
City of Harrisburg, PA
Pennsylvania F C
providenceri.gov
City of Providence, RI
Rhode Island B B
northcharleston.org
City of North Charleston, SC
South Carolina F C
knoxvilletnpolice.gov
City of Knoxville, TN
Tennessee C B
allentx.gov
City of Allen, TX
Texas D B
austintexas.gov
City of Austin, TX
Texas B C
cstx.gov
City of College Station, TX
Texas D B
cityofconroe.org
City of Conroe, TX
Texas F C
harriscountytx.gov
City of Harris County, TX
Texas B B
thecityofhedwigvillage.com
City of Hedwig Village, TX
Texas D B
hilshirevillagetexas.com
City of Hilshire Village, TX
Texas F C
houstontx.gov
City of Houston, TX
Texas D C
cityofhumbletx.gov
City of Humble, TX
Texas D C
irvingtx.gov
City of Irving, TX
Texas B D
cityofpineypoint.com
City of Piney Point Village, TX
Texas D C
plano.gov
City of Plano, TX
Texas C C
roundrocktexas.gov
City of Round Rock, TX
Texas C B
alexandriava.gov
City of Alexandria, VA
Virginia D B
rva.gov
City of Richmond, VA
Virginia D C
bellevuewa.gov
City of Bellevue, WA
Washington B C
olympiawa.gov
City of Olympia, WA
Washington C C
seattle.gov
City of Seattle, WA
Washington D C
spokane.gov
City of Spokane, WA
Washington D D
charlestonwv.gov
City of Charleston, WV
West Virginia D D
cityofmadison.com
City of Madison, WI
Wisconsin F B

About these checks

A sitemap is an XML file that lists the pages on a site. Search engines and AI agents read it to find pages they would otherwise miss, and robots.txt is where they look for its address. These botability checks test each part of that. A site with a working sitemap and no robots.txt file counts as passing here, since there is no file to list the sitemap in.

  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.

Guidance

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 9/30/2026 and 11/5/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 54 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

4 fully scanned city sites have no result for these checks and are left out of the share.

Plans Demo