Of the 2,431 fully scanned U.S. county sites we tested, 39 (2%) need JavaScript to show their main content. Pages built this way load slowly. The browser has to run the script before it can show anything. The companies behind the biggest AI agents also say they do not index content rendered this way. So these pages stay out of the AI knowledge base. Among states with at least 10 tested sites, Arizona has the highest share (10%). West Virginia has the lowest (0%). This page uses the Content available in document check. It passes when the page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript. We ran it only on sites that looked like they use JavaScript to show content. A site with no result counts as passing.
39 of 2,431
County sites that need JavaScript to show their main content
2%
Share of tested county sites failing this check
22 of 48
States with at least one failing county site
10%
Arizona has the highest share: 1 of 10 tested county sites
County websites that need JavaScript to show their content, by county
Each highlighted county has a site that needs JavaScript to show its main content. Select one to open its botability report.
- Needs JavaScript (39)
- Content in the HTML (2,382), or no site on our list (334)
- Not fully scanned (386)
We could not place 25 of the 2,832 sites on the map. They are in the table.
By state
Share of each state's tested county sites that need JavaScript to show their main content. Select a state for its botability rankings.
| State | Tested | Needs JavaScript | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | 10 | 1 | 10% |
| Ohio | 81 | 7 | 9% |
| Idaho | 37 | 3 | 8% |
| New Jersey | 13 | 1 | 8% |
| Alaska | 15 | 1 | 7% |
| Wisconsin | 52 | 3 | 6% |
| Maryland | 19 | 1 | 5% |
| California | 40 | 2 | 5% |
| Kansas | 84 | 4 | 5% |
| Wyoming | 22 | 1 | 5% |
| Colorado | 33 | 1 | 3% |
| Washington | 35 | 1 | 3% |
| South Carolina | 41 | 1 | 2% |
| Georgia | 132 | 3 | 2% |
| Florida | 51 | 1 | 2% |
| Indiana | 51 | 1 | 2% |
| New York | 52 | 1 | 2% |
| Pennsylvania | 55 | 1 | 2% |
| Michigan | 69 | 1 | 1% |
| Minnesota | 73 | 1 | 1% |
| Nebraska | 92 | 1 | 1% |
| Texas | 237 | 2 | 1% |
| Arkansas | 41 | 0 | 0% |
| Connecticut | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| Delaware | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| Hawaii | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Illinois | 86 | 0 | 0% |
| Iowa | 78 | 0 | 0% |
| Kentucky | 96 | 0 | 0% |
| Louisiana | 41 | 0 | 0% |
| Maine | 13 | 0 | 0% |
| Massachusetts | 7 | 0 | 0% |
| Mississippi | 68 | 0 | 0% |
| Missouri | 87 | 0 | 0% |
| Montana | 49 | 0 | 0% |
| Nevada | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| New Hampshire | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| New Mexico | 28 | 0 | 0% |
| North Carolina | 85 | 0 | 0% |
| North Dakota | 44 | 0 | 0% |
| Oklahoma | 51 | 0 | 0% |
| Oregon | 30 | 0 | 0% |
| South Dakota | 51 | 0 | 0% |
| Tennessee | 84 | 0 | 0% |
| Utah | 28 | 0 | 0% |
| Vermont | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Virginia | 82 | 0 | 0% |
| West Virginia | 50 | 0 | 0% |
All 39 county sites need JavaScript to show their main content
Sorted by state, then name. Each site links to its botability report and shows its botability and overall grades from the same scan.
| Site | State | Botability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
| muni.org Anchorage, AK |
Alaska | F | C |
| pima.gov Pima County, AZ |
Arizona | C | B |
| co.del-norte.ca.us Del Norte County, CA |
California | D | C |
| countyofsb.org Santa Barbara County, CA |
California | C | C |
| lpcgov.org La Plata County, CO |
Colorado | D | B |
| myescambia.com Escambia County, FL |
Florida | C | B |
| greenecountyga.gov Greene County, GA |
Georgia | C | C |
| henrycountyga.gov Henry County, GA |
Georgia | D | C |
| walkercountyga.gov Walker County, GA |
Georgia | F | C |
| binghamid.gov Bingham County, ID |
Idaho | C | C |
| bonnercountyid.gov Bonner County, ID |
Idaho | D | C |
| cassia.gov Cassia County, ID |
Idaho | B | C |
| montgomerycounty.in.gov Montgomery County, IN |
Indiana | C | C |
| grantcoks.org Grant County, KS |
Kansas | C | C |
| leavenworthcounty.gov Leavenworth County, KS |
Kansas | F | C |
| meadeco.org Meade County, KS |
Kansas | C | C |
| nortoncountyks.gov Norton County, KS |
Kansas | C | C |
| kentcounty.com Kent County, MD |
Maryland | F | C |
| washtenaw.org Washtenaw County, MI |
Michigan | D | D |
| stearnscountymn.gov Stearns County, MN |
Minnesota | D | C |
| plattecounty.ne.gov Platte County, NE |
Nebraska | C | B |
| cumberlandcountynj.gov Cumberland County, NJ |
New Jersey | F | C |
| albanycountyny.gov Albany County, NY |
New York | D | C |
| co.clinton.oh.us Clinton County, OH |
Ohio | C | D |
| huroncounty-oh.gov Huron County, OH |
Ohio | F | D |
| jeffersoncountyoh.com Jefferson County, OH |
Ohio | F | D |
| pikecountyohcommissioners.gov Pike County, OH |
Ohio | B | A |
| richlandcountyoh.gov Richland County, OH |
Ohio | B | C |
| sciotocountyoh.com Scioto County, OH |
Ohio | F | D |
| unioncountyohio.gov Union County, OH |
Ohio | C | C |
| phila.gov Philadelphia County, PA |
Pennsylvania | D | C |
| orangeburgcounty.org Orangeburg County, SC |
South Carolina | D | C |
| bastropcounty.gov Bastrop County, TX |
Texas | F | C |
| co.orange.tx.us Orange County, TX |
Texas | C | D |
| co.adams.wa.gov Adams County, WA |
Washington | D | C |
| crawfordcountywi.gov Crawford County, WI |
Wisconsin | C | C |
| iowacountywi.gov Iowa County, WI |
Wisconsin | C | C |
| co.portage.wi.gov Portage County, WI |
Wisconsin | C | C |
| albanycountywy.gov Albany County, WY |
Wyoming | C | C |
About this check
Content available in document is one of the botability checks. The page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript.
Why it matters
Client-side rendering is a slow way to deliver a page. The browser has to download and run the script before it can show any content, so the page loads poorly. It also keeps you out of AI answers. The companies behind the biggest AI agents say they do not index content rendered on the client. A page built this way is not part of their knowledge base.
Risk
Bots cannot read your content.
Guidance
- Content available in document standard, with how to fix it
- The Web Robots Pages
- Counties botability rankings
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county government site on our county list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 7/18/2026 and 10/25/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 401 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.