Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges: accessibility rankings

Accessibility scores, grades, and the most common failures for 33 Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges campus websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 33
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Campuses of the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.

A 94

Average accessibility score of 28 fully scanned Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges campus sites

5th

of 57 systems, ranked by average accessibility score

28 of 33

Washington state board for community and technical colleges campus sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 5, so they're listed without grades

A 91

Average accessibility score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges accessibility scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 28 fully scanned Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 28 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges accessibility scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 893
90 to 10025

Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges: 28 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Washington State Board for Community and Technical CollegesA (90 to 100): 89% (25 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 11% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 66% (1,765 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 33% (888 sites)D to F (below 70): 1% (34 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges89% (25)11% (3)0% (0)
All education sites66% (1,765)33% (888)1% (34)

Top 3 Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges campus sites by accessibility score

#1 in Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges · U.S. education rank 1

Centralia College

A 100 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability D
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges · U.S. education rank 1

Lake Washington Institute of Technology

A 100 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security D
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges · U.S. education rank 1

Olympic College

A 100 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common accessibility failures among Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges campus sites

Share of the 28 fully scanned Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges campus sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names29% (8 of 28 sites)
  2. Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order25% (7 of 28 sites)
  3. Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing21% (6 of 28 sites)
  4. Document has a main landmark18% (5 of 28 sites)
  5. Links have a discernible name14% (4 of 28 sites)
View the data table
Most common accessibility failures among Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges campus sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names29%8
Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order25%7
Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing21%6
Document has a main landmark18%5
Links have a discernible name14%4

What each check means

Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges campuses by accessibility score

Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges campuses ranked by accessibility score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 centralia.edu
Centralia College U.S. rank 1
22 of 22 checks pass A
1 lwtech.edu
Lake Washington Institute of Technology U.S. rank 1
23 of 23 checks pass A
1 olympic.edu
Olympic College U.S. rank 1
33 of 33 checks pass A
1 rtc.edu
Renton Technical College U.S. rank 1
24 of 24 checks pass A
1 spscc.edu
South Puget Sound Community College U.S. rank 1
27 of 27 checks pass A
2 ghc.edu
Grays Harbor College U.S. rank 2
33 of 34 checks pass A
2 wvc.edu
Wenatchee Valley College U.S. rank 2
33 of 34 checks pass A
3 cascadia.edu
Cascadia College U.S. rank 3
25 of 26 checks pass A
3 clark.edu
Clark College U.S. rank 3
27 of 28 checks pass A
3 edmonds.edu
Edmonds College U.S. rank 3
29 of 30 checks pass A
3 everettcc.edu
Everett Community College U.S. rank 3
31 of 32 checks pass A
3 highline.edu
Highline College U.S. rank 3
29 of 30 checks pass A
3 pierce.ctc.edu
Pierce College District U.S. rank 3
27 of 28 checks pass A
3 skagit.edu
Skagit Valley College U.S. rank 3
27 of 28 checks pass A
4 cptc.edu
Clover Park Technical College U.S. rank 5
33 of 35 checks pass A
4 lowercolumbia.edu
Lower Columbia College U.S. rank 5
33 of 35 checks pass A
5 bigbend.edu
Big Bend Community College U.S. rank 6
28 of 30 checks pass A
5 columbiabasin.edu
Columbia Basin College U.S. rank 6
27 of 29 checks pass A
5 greenriver.edu
Green River College U.S. rank 6
30 of 32 checks pass A
6 tacomacc.edu
Tacoma Community College U.S. rank 7
24 of 26 checks pass A
6 wwcc.edu
Walla Walla Community College U.S. rank 7
25 of 27 checks pass A
7 northseattle.edu
North Seattle College U.S. rank 9
28 of 31 checks pass A
7 seattlecentral.edu
Seattle Central College U.S. rank 9
29 of 32 checks pass A
7 shoreline.edu
Shoreline Community College U.S. rank 9
30 of 33 checks pass A
7 southseattle.edu
South Seattle College U.S. rank 9
29 of 32 checks pass A
8 sfcc.spokane.edu
Spokane Falls Community College U.S. rank 12
29 of 33 checks pass B
9 scc.spokane.edu
Spokane Community College U.S. rank 15
28 of 33 checks pass B
10 btc.edu
Bellingham Technical College U.S. rank 16
26 of 31 checks pass B
batestech.edu
Bates Technical College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
bellevuecollege.edu
Bellevue College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
pencol.edu
Peninsula College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
whatcom.edu
Whatcom Community College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
yvcc.edu
Yakima Valley College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/26/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 5 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo