Showing University of Massachusetts sites. All education sites
Campuses of the University of Massachusetts. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.
A 95
Average accessibility score of 6 fully scanned University of Massachusetts campus sites
4th
of 57 systems, ranked by average accessibility score
6 of 6
University of massachusetts campus sites fully scanned
A 91
Average accessibility score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How University of Massachusetts accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 6 fully scanned University of Massachusetts campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 6 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- University of Massachusetts average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 1 |
| 90 to 100 | 5 |
University of Massachusetts by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. University of Massachusetts: 6 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Massachusetts | 83% (5) | 17% (1) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 66% (1,765) | 33% (888) | 1% (34) |
Top 3 University of Massachusetts campus sites by accessibility score
#1 in University of Massachusetts · U.S. education rank 1
University of Massachusetts-Boston
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
#1 in University of Massachusetts · U.S. education rank 1
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
#2 in University of Massachusetts · U.S. education rank 3
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
A 96 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
What each check means
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. Buttons and interactive elements are large enough to tap easily on touch screens. Users with motor disabilities struggle to tap small buttons.
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order. Page headings follow a logical order without skipping levels. Keyboard users cannot efficiently navigate your site.
- Buttons have an accessible name. Buttons have labels so screen readers can describe their action. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Form elements have associated labels. Form fields have labels so screen readers can identify them. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values. Accessibility attributes use valid values so screen readers can interpret them. Screen readers cannot interpret attributes with unrecognized values.
University of Massachusetts campuses by accessibility score
6 sites, 6 fully scanned, average accessibility score 95 (A). Part of the headline average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
umb.edu
University of Massachusetts-Boston U.S. rank 1 |
31 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
umassd.edu
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth U.S. rank 1 |
31 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
umassmed.edu
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
umass.edu
University of Massachusetts-Amherst U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
uml.edu
University of Massachusetts-Lowell U.S. rank 9 |
27 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
umassglobal.edu
University of Massachusetts Global U.S. rank 11 |
32 of 36 checks pass | B |
System office by accessibility score
1 sites, 1 fully scanned. Not part of the average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
massachusetts.edu
University of Massachusetts-Central Office U.S. rank 6 |
30 of 32 checks pass | A |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.