Touro University System: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 6 Touro University System campus websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 6
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Campuses of the Touro University System. The system office site is listed but not averaged, since it is not a campus homepage.

F 33

Average readability score of 6 fully scanned Touro University System campus sites

26th

of 57 systems, ranked by average readability score

6 of 6

Touro university system campus sites fully scanned

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Touro University System readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 6 fully scanned Touro University System campus sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 6 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Touro University System average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Touro University System readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 94
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1002

Touro University System by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Touro University System: 6 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Touro University SystemA (90 to 100): 33% (2 sites)D to F (below 70): 67% (4 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Touro University System by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Touro University System33% (2)0% (0)67% (4)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 Touro University System campus sites by readability score

#1 in Touro University System · U.S. education rank 1

Hebrew Theological College

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Touro University System · U.S. education rank 1

Touro University California

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#2 in Touro University System · U.S. education rank 150

New York Medical College

F 0 readability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability F

Most common readability failures among Touro University System campus sites

Share of the 6 fully scanned Touro University System campus sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level67% (4 of 6 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among Touro University System campus sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level67%4

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

Touro University System campuses by readability score

Touro University System campuses ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 htc.edu
Hebrew Theological College U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 tu.edu
Touro University California U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
2 nymc.edu
New York Medical College U.S. rank 150
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 touro.edu
Touro University U.S. rank 140
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 tun.touro.edu
Touro University Nevada U.S. rank 184
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 tuw.edu
Touro University Worldwide U.S. rank 40
0 of 1 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo