Showing South Carolina college and university sites. All education sites
Public colleges and universities in South Carolina are ranked and averaged together; private nonprofit institutions are listed below with their own average.
A 94
Average accessibility score of 28 fully scanned South Carolina public college sites
4th
of 48 states and territories, ranked by average accessibility score
28 of 29
South carolina public college sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades
A 91
Average accessibility score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How South Carolina accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 28 fully scanned South Carolina public college sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 28 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- South Carolina average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 4 |
| 90 to 100 | 23 |
South Carolina by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. South Carolina: 28 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | 82% (23) | 18% (5) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 66% (1,765) | 33% (888) | 1% (34) |
Top 3 South Carolina public college sites by accessibility score
#1 in South Carolina · U.S. education rank 1
Central Carolina Technical College
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
#1 in South Carolina · U.S. education rank 1
Citadel Military College of South Carolina
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
#1 in South Carolina · U.S. education rank 1
Lander University
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability F
What each check means
- Document has a main landmark. The page has exactly one main content area so screen readers can navigate to it. Screen reader users cannot skip directly to main content.
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order. Page headings follow a logical order without skipping levels. Keyboard users cannot efficiently navigate your site.
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. Buttons and interactive elements are large enough to tap easily on touch screens. Users with motor disabilities struggle to tap small buttons.
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents. Interactive elements are not hidden from screen reader users. Keyboard users can focus elements that screen readers cannot announce.
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio. Text and background colors meet minimum contrast ratios. Users with low vision cannot read your text.
South Carolina public 4-year institutions by accessibility score
14 sites, 13 fully scanned, average accessibility score 96 (A). Part of the headline average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
citadel.edu
Citadel Military College of South Carolina U.S. rank 1 |
30 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
lander.edu
Lander University U.S. rank 1 |
30 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
uscupstate.edu
University of South Carolina-Upstate U.S. rank 1 |
25 of 25 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
usca.edu
University of South Carolina Aiken U.S. rank 2 |
35 of 36 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
clemson.edu
Clemson University U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
charleston.edu
College of Charleston U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
gvltec.edu
Greenville Technical College U.S. rank 3 |
25 of 26 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
sc.edu
University of South Carolina-Columbia U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
winthrop.edu
Winthrop University U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
uscb.edu
University of South Carolina Beaufort U.S. rank 4 |
22 of 23 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
web.musc.edu
Medical University of South Carolina U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
scsu.edu
South Carolina State University U.S. rank 6 |
31 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
fmarion.edu
Francis Marion University U.S. rank 12 |
28 of 32 checks pass | B |
|
coastal.edu
|
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - |
South Carolina public 2-year institutions by accessibility score
15 sites, 15 fully scanned, average accessibility score 92 (A). Part of the headline average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
cctech.edu
Central Carolina Technical College U.S. rank 1 |
33 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
octech.edu
Orangeburg Calhoun Technical College U.S. rank 1 |
32 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
tridenttech.edu
Trident Technical College U.S. rank 1 |
31 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
midlandstech.edu
Midlands Technical College U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
netc.edu
Northeastern Technical College U.S. rank 3 |
26 of 27 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
sccsc.edu
Spartanburg Community College U.S. rank 3 |
25 of 26 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
ptc.edu
Piedmont Technical College U.S. rank 5 |
34 of 36 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
denmarktech.edu
Denmark Technical College U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
yorktech.edu
York Technical College U.S. rank 6 |
31 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
atc.edu
Aiken Technical College U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
fdtc.edu
Florence-Darlington Technical College U.S. rank 8 |
32 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
wiltech.edu
Williamsburg Technical College U.S. rank 10 |
25 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
tcl.edu
Technical College of the Lowcountry U.S. rank 11 |
32 of 36 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
tctc.edu
Tri-County Technical College U.S. rank 17 |
23 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
hgtc.edu
Horry-Georgetown Technical College U.S. rank 22 |
17 of 22 checks pass | C |
South Carolina private nonprofit institutions by accessibility score
22 sites, 19 fully scanned, average accessibility score 91 (A). Ranked among themselves. Not part of the public average above.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
furman.edu
Furman University U.S. rank 2 |
33 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
allenuniversity.edu
Allen University U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
converse.edu
Converse University U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
newberry.edu
Newberry College U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
presby.edu
Presbyterian College U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
swu.edu
Southern Wesleyan University U.S. rank 3 |
25 of 26 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
limestone.edu
Limestone University U.S. rank 4 |
22 of 23 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
acba.edu
American College of the Building Arts U.S. rank 6 |
30 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
bju.edu
Bob Jones University U.S. rank 6 |
31 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
claflin.edu
Claflin University U.S. rank 7 |
25 of 27 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
smcsc.edu
Spartanburg Methodist College U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
columbiasc.edu
Columbia College U.S. rank 8 |
31 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
ciu.edu
Columbia International University U.S. rank 9 |
27 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 8 |
andersonuniversity.edu
Anderson University U.S. rank 12 |
29 of 33 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
wofford.edu
Wofford College U.S. rank 13 |
20 of 23 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
benedict.edu
Benedict College U.S. rank 15 |
28 of 33 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
coker.edu
Coker University U.S. rank 15 |
27 of 32 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
voorhees.edu
Voorhees University U.S. rank 17 |
29 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
ngu.edu
North Greenville University U.S. rank 23 |
16 of 21 checks pass | C |
|
erskine.edu
Erskine College |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
morris.edu
Morris College |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
sherman.edu
Sherman College of Chiropractic |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 | - |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.