Showing Missouri college and university sites. All education sites
Public colleges and universities in Missouri are ranked and averaged together; private nonprofit institutions are listed below with their own average.
A 94
Average accessibility score of 24 fully scanned Missouri public college sites
4th
of 48 states and territories, ranked by average accessibility score
24 of 27
Missouri public college sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 3, so they're listed without grades
A 91
Average accessibility score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Missouri accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 24 fully scanned Missouri public college sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 24 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Missouri average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 5 |
| 90 to 100 | 19 |
Missouri by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Missouri: 24 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri | 79% (19) | 21% (5) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 66% (1,765) | 33% (888) | 1% (34) |
Top 3 Missouri public college sites by accessibility score
#1 in Missouri · U.S. education rank 1
Crowder College
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability C
- Readability A
#1 in Missouri · U.S. education rank 1
University of Missouri-Kansas City
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
#1 in Missouri · U.S. education rank 1
University of Missouri-St Louis
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability D
- Security B
- Usability F
- Readability F
What each check means
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names. A button or link's visible label matches what screen readers announce. Voice control users cannot activate elements by their visible label.
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. Buttons and interactive elements are large enough to tap easily on touch screens. Users with motor disabilities struggle to tap small buttons.
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order. Page headings follow a logical order without skipping levels. Keyboard users cannot efficiently navigate your site.
- Links have a discernible name. Links have unique, descriptive text so users know where they go. Screen reader users cannot identify or interact with elements.
- Document has a main landmark. The page has exactly one main content area so screen readers can navigate to it. Screen reader users cannot skip directly to main content.
Missouri public 4-year institutions by accessibility score
15 sites, 14 fully scanned, average accessibility score 93 (A). Part of the headline average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
umkc.edu
University of Missouri-Kansas City U.S. rank 1 |
37 of 37 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
umsl.edu
University of Missouri-St Louis U.S. rank 1 |
32 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
umsystem.edu
University of Missouri-System Office U.S. rank 1 |
35 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
lincolnu.edu
Lincoln University U.S. rank 3 |
27 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
missouristate.edu
Missouri State University-Springfield U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
missouriwestern.edu
Missouri Western State University U.S. rank 3 |
27 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
mssu.edu
Missouri Southern State University U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
truman.edu
Truman State University U.S. rank 6 |
30 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
nwmissouri.edu
Northwest Missouri State University U.S. rank 9 |
28 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
missouri.edu
University of Missouri-Columbia U.S. rank 9 |
28 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
stlcc.edu
Saint Louis Community College U.S. rank 10 |
25 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 5 |
ucmo.edu
University of Central Missouri U.S. rank 10 |
25 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 6 |
semo.edu
Southeast Missouri State University U.S. rank 11 |
32 of 36 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
mst.edu
Missouri University of Science and Technology U.S. rank 18 |
26 of 32 checks pass | B |
|
hssu.edu
Harris-Stowe State University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - |
Missouri public 2-year institutions by accessibility score
12 sites, 10 fully scanned, average accessibility score 95 (A). Part of the headline average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
crowder.edu
Crowder College U.S. rank 1 |
28 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
eastcentral.edu
East Central College U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
jeffco.edu
Jefferson College U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
mcckc.edu
Metropolitan Community College-Kansas City U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
wp.missouristate.edu
Missouri State University-West Plains U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
stchas.edu
St Charles Community College U.S. rank 3 |
32 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
sfccmo.edu
State Fair Community College U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
trcc.edu
Three Rivers College U.S. rank 3 |
24 of 25 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
statetechmo.edu
State Technical College of Missouri U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
mineralarea.edu
Mineral Area College U.S. rank 14 |
23 of 27 checks pass | B |
|
macc.edu
Moberly Area Community College |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 | - | |
|
ncmissouri.edu
North Central Missouri College |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 | - |
Missouri private nonprofit institutions by accessibility score
43 sites, 43 fully scanned, average accessibility score 90 (A). Ranked among themselves. Not part of the public average above.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
bolivarcollege.edu
Bolivar Technical College U.S. rank 1 |
30 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
conception.edu
Conception Seminary College U.S. rank 1 |
29 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
kenrick.edu
Kenrick Glennon Seminary U.S. rank 1 |
30 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
atsu.edu
A T Still University of Health Sciences U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
ai.edu
Aquinas Institute of Theology U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
barnesjewishcollege.edu
Barnes-Jewish College Goldfarb School of Nursing U.S. rank 3 |
27 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
logan.edu
Logan University U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
maryville.edu
Maryville University of Saint Louis U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
moval.edu
Missouri Valley College U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
slu.edu
Saint Louis University U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
stephens.edu
Stephens College U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
uhsp.edu
University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
wcmo.edu
Westminster College U.S. rank 3 |
32 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
jewell.edu
William Jewell College U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
kcai.edu
Kansas City Art Institute U.S. rank 4 |
23 of 24 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
webster.edu
Webster University U.S. rank 5 |
32 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
ccis.edu
Columbia College U.S. rank 6 |
30 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
kansascity.edu
Kansas City University U.S. rank 6 |
27 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
occ.edu
Ozark Christian College U.S. rank 6 |
29 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
sbuniv.edu
Southwest Baptist University U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
lindenwood.edu
Lindenwood University U.S. rank 7 |
25 of 27 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
washu.edu
Washington University in St Louis U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
park.edu
Park University U.S. rank 8 |
22 of 24 checks pass | A |
| 8 |
evangel.edu
Evangel University U.S. rank 9 |
30 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 9 |
calvary.edu
Calvary University U.S. rank 10 |
25 of 28 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
cofo.edu
College of the Ozarks U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
covenantseminary.edu
Covenant Theological Seminary U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 9 |
coxcollege.edu
Cox College U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 10 |
cityvision.edu
City Vision University U.S. rank 11 |
31 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
cottey.edu
Cottey College U.S. rank 12 |
27 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 11 |
rockhurst.edu
Rockhurst University U.S. rank 12 |
27 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
culver.edu
Culver-Stockton College U.S. rank 13 |
25 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 12 |
williamwoods.edu
William Woods University U.S. rank 13 |
25 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 13 |
drury.edu
Drury University U.S. rank 14 |
18 of 21 checks pass | B |
| 13 |
mbts.edu
Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary U.S. rank 14 |
23 of 27 checks pass | B |
| 14 |
centralmethodist.edu
Central Methodist University U.S. rank 15 |
22 of 26 checks pass | B |
| 15 |
csl.edu
Concordia Seminary U.S. rank 16 |
26 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 16 |
nts.edu
Nazarene Theological Seminary U.S. rank 17 |
24 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 17 |
mobap.edu
Missouri Baptist University U.S. rank 19 |
28 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 18 |
fontbonne.edu
Fontbonne University U.S. rank 21 |
22 of 28 checks pass | C |
| 19 |
ranken.edu
Ranken Technical College U.S. rank 25 |
26 of 35 checks pass | C |
| 20 |
mission.edu
Mission University U.S. rank 26 |
17 of 23 checks pass | C |
| 20 |
urshan.edu
Urshan University U.S. rank 26 |
11 of 15 checks pass | C |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/25/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 3 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.