Showing Maryland college and university sites. All education sites
Public colleges and universities in Maryland are ranked and averaged together; private nonprofit institutions are listed below with their own average.
A 95
Average accessibility score of 28 fully scanned Maryland public college sites
3rd
of 48 states and territories, ranked by average accessibility score
28 of 30
Maryland public college sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades
A 91
Average accessibility score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Maryland accessibility scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 28 fully scanned Maryland public college sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 28 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Maryland average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 4 |
| 90 to 100 | 24 |
Maryland by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Maryland: 28 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | 86% (24) | 14% (4) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 66% (1,765) | 33% (888) | 1% (34) |
Top 3 Maryland public college sites by accessibility score
#1 in Maryland · U.S. education rank 1
Baltimore City Community College
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability D
- Security B
- Usability D
- Readability A
#1 in Maryland · U.S. education rank 1
Cecil College
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability A
- Readability F
#1 in Maryland · U.S. education rank 1
College of Southern Maryland
A 100 accessibility
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability F
- Readability A
What each check means
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. Buttons and interactive elements are large enough to tap easily on touch screens. Users with motor disabilities struggle to tap small buttons.
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names. A button or link's visible label matches what screen readers announce. Voice control users cannot activate elements by their visible label.
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order. Page headings follow a logical order without skipping levels. Keyboard users cannot efficiently navigate your site.
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents. Interactive elements are not hidden from screen reader users. Keyboard users can focus elements that screen readers cannot announce.
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio. Text and background colors meet minimum contrast ratios. Users with low vision cannot read your text.
Maryland public 4-year institutions by accessibility score
14 sites, 13 fully scanned, average accessibility score 94 (A). Part of the headline average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
salisbury.edu
Salisbury University U.S. rank 1 |
32 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
ubalt.edu
University of Baltimore U.S. rank 1 |
29 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
umbc.edu
University of Maryland-Baltimore County U.S. rank 1 |
36 of 36 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
umaryland.edu
University of Maryland, Baltimore U.S. rank 1 |
29 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
bowiestate.edu
Bowie State University U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
morgan.edu
Morgan State University U.S. rank 3 |
25 of 26 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
umd.edu
University of Maryland-College Park U.S. rank 3 |
24 of 25 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
towson.edu
Towson University U.S. rank 5 |
32 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
umgc.edu
University of Maryland Global Campus U.S. rank 6 |
31 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
smcm.edu
St. Mary's College of Maryland U.S. rank 7 |
24 of 26 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
coppin.edu
Coppin State University U.S. rank 9 |
29 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
frostburg.edu
Frostburg State University U.S. rank 19 |
24 of 30 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
usna.edu
United States Naval Academy U.S. rank 19 |
24 of 30 checks pass | B |
|
umes.edu
University of Maryland Eastern Shore |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - |
Maryland public 2-year institutions by accessibility score
16 sites, 15 fully scanned, average accessibility score 96 (A). Part of the headline average.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
bccc.edu
Baltimore City Community College U.S. rank 1 |
30 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
cecil.edu
Cecil College U.S. rank 1 |
32 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
csmd.edu
College of Southern Maryland U.S. rank 1 |
36 of 36 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
ccbcmd.edu
Community College of Baltimore County U.S. rank 1 |
34 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
frederick.edu
Frederick Community College U.S. rank 1 |
31 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
montgomerycollege.edu
Montgomery College U.S. rank 1 |
25 of 25 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
garrettcollege.edu
Garrett College U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
harford.edu
Harford Community College U.S. rank 3 |
29 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
worwic.edu
Wor-Wic Community College U.S. rank 3 |
32 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
howardcc.edu
Howard Community College U.S. rank 4 |
23 of 24 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
chesapeake.edu
Chesapeake College U.S. rank 5 |
32 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
aacc.edu
Anne Arundel Community College U.S. rank 7 |
26 of 28 checks pass | A |
| 6 |
carrollcc.edu
Carroll Community College U.S. rank 8 |
31 of 34 checks pass | A |
| 7 |
hagerstowncc.edu
Hagerstown Community College U.S. rank 11 |
24 of 27 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
allegany.edu
Allegany College of Maryland U.S. rank 13 |
25 of 29 checks pass | B |
|
pgcc.edu
Prince George's Community College |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 | - |
Maryland private nonprofit institutions by accessibility score
15 sites, 14 fully scanned, average accessibility score 90 (A). Ranked among themselves. Not part of the public average above.
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
ndm.edu
Notre Dame of Maryland University U.S. rank 2 |
34 of 35 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
captechu.edu
Capitol Technology University U.S. rank 3 |
28 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
goucher.edu
Goucher College U.S. rank 3 |
31 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
hood.edu
Hood College U.S. rank 3 |
30 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
loyola.edu
Loyola University Maryland U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
mcdaniel.edu
McDaniel College U.S. rank 6 |
27 of 29 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
washcoll.edu
Washington College U.S. rank 6 |
28 of 30 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
bhmb.edu
Bais HaMedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore U.S. rank 9 |
29 of 32 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
stevenson.edu
Stevenson University U.S. rank 9 |
28 of 31 checks pass | A |
| 4 |
wits.edu
Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College U.S. rank 9 |
30 of 33 checks pass | A |
| 5 |
sjc.edu
St. John's College U.S. rank 10 |
26 of 29 checks pass | B |
| 6 |
jhu.edu
Johns Hopkins University U.S. rank 17 |
29 of 35 checks pass | B |
| 7 |
mica.edu
Maryland Institute College of Art U.S. rank 19 |
25 of 31 checks pass | B |
| 8 |
nirc.edu
Ner Israel Rabbinical College U.S. rank 24 |
25 of 33 checks pass | C |
|
msmary.edu
Mount St. Mary's University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 | - |
About accessibility
Meet WCAG standards so every type of user can use your website.
Why it's important
People with disabilities need equal access to information and services online.
Risks
- People with disabilities cannot use your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade accessibility:
Standards
- [accesskey] values are unique
- [aria-*] attributes match their roles
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements
- button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used
- Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" have accessible names
- [aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body>
- [aria-hidden="true"] elements do not contain focusable descendents
- ARIA input fields have accessible names
- ARIA meter elements have accessible names
- ARIA progressbar elements have accessible names
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes
- [role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes
- Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] have all required children
- [role]s are contained by their required parent element
- [role] values are valid
- Elements with the role=text attribute do not have focusable descendents
- ARIA toggle fields have accessible names
- ARIA tooltip elements have accessible names
- ARIA treeitem elements have accessible names
- [aria-*] attributes have valid values
- [aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled
- Buttons have an accessible name
- The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio
- <dl>'s contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements
- Definition list items are wrapped in <dl> elements
- Document has a <title> element
- ARIA IDs are unique
- No form fields have multiple labels
- <frame> or <iframe> elements have a title
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
- <html> element has a [lang] attribute
- <html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute
- <html> element has an [xml:lang] attribute with the same base language as the [lang] attribute
- Image elements have [alt] attributes
- Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text
- Input buttons have discernible text
- <input type="image"> elements have [alt] text
- Form elements have associated labels
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color
- Links have a discernible name
- Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>)
- List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements
- The document does not use <meta http-equiv="refresh">
- [user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5
- <object> elements have alternate text
- Select elements have associated label elements
- Skip links are focusable
- No element has a [tabindex] value greater than 0
- Tables have different content in the summary attribute and <caption>
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing
- Cells in a <table> element that use the [headers] attribute refer to table cells within the same table
- <th> elements and elements with [role="columnheader"/"rowheader"] have data cells they describe
- [lang] attributes have a valid value
- <video> elements contain a <track> element with [kind="captions"]
- All heading elements contain content
- Identical links have the same purpose
- Document has a main landmark
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names
- Tables use <caption> instead of cells with the [colspan] attribute to indicate a caption
- <td> elements in a large <table> have one or more table headers
- Image aspect ratio
- Valid doctype
- Character encoding
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.